Page 144 - Handbook of Energy Engineering Calculations
P. 144

overall heat sink is identical—25 percent larger than the base case—because
               the  steam  extracted  from  the  l-p  turbine  reduces  the  required  cooling
               capacity.  Note  that  this  also  reduces  steam-turbine  output  by  2  MW
               compared  to  the  mechanical  chiller,  but  has  less  effect  on  overall  plant
               output.

                  Cost  estimates  summarized  in Table  1  show  that  the  absorption  chilling
               system  required  here  costs  about  $4-million,  or  about  $230/kW  of  added
               output. Compared to the base case, raw-water consumption increases O&M

               costs by $35/h when the chiller is operating. Disposal of additional cooling-
               water blow-down adds $17/h.
                  Compared  to  mechanical  chillers,  absorption  units  may  not  handle  load
               changes as well; therefore they may not be acceptable for cycling or load-
               following  operation.  When  forced  to  operate  below  their  rated  capacity,

               absorption  chillers  suffer  a  loss  in  efficiency  and  reportedly  require  more
               operator attention than mechanical systems.
                  Refrigerant  issues  affect  the  comparison  between  mechanical  and

               absorption  chilling.  Mechanical  chillers  use  either  halogenated  or
               nonhalogenated  fluorocarbons  at  this  time.  Halogenated  fluorocarbons,
               preferred by industry because they reduce the compressor load compared to
               nonhalogenated  materials,  will  be  phased  out  by  the  end  of  the  decade
               because of environmental considerations (destruction of the ozone layer). Use

               of  nonhalogenated  refrigerants  is  expected  to  increase  both  the  cost  and
               parasitic  power  consumption  for  mechanical  systems,  at  least  in  the  near
               term. However, absorption chillers using either ammonia or lithium bromide

               will be unaffected by the new environmental regulations.
                  Off-peak  thermal  storage  is  one  way  to  mitigate  the  impact  of  inlet-air
               chilling’s major drawback: high parasitic power consumption. A portion of
               the  plant’s  electrical  or  thermal  output  is  used  to  make  ice  or  cool  water
               during off-peak hours. During peak hours, the chilling system is turned off

               and the stored ice and/or cold water is used to chill the turbine inlet air. A
               major advantage is that plants can maximize their output during periods of
               peak  demand  when  capacity  payments  are  at  the  highest  level.  Thermal

               storage  and  its  equipment  requirements  are  analyzed  in  Section  13  of  this
               handbook.


               5. Compare steam and water injection alternatives
   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149