Page 40 - Handbook of Properties of Textile and Technical Fibres
P. 40

Testing and characterization                                   2


           of fibers

                                             1
                            1
           Anthony R. Bunsell , Sébastien Joann  es , Alba Marcellan  2
           1                                              2
            MINES ParisTech, Centre des Matériaux, Evry Cedex, France; UMR CNRS 7615, ESPCI
           Paris, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Sorbonne-Universités, Paris, France

           2.1   Introduction

           As we have seen in Chapter 1, fibers owe their flexibility to their fineness, as it is
           related to the reciprocal of the “fiber diameter” to the fourth power. This means that
           if the diameter of a right circular cylinder (a reasonable model of a fiber as a first
           approximation) is reduced by a half, it becomes 16 times more flexible. Thus, despite
           very high tensile moduli, fibers are highly flexible and can easily be organized into
           complex structures such as threads or woven fabrics. This characteristic is obviously
           very important in determining their use; after all sheet metal, or even chain mail, never
           became fashion items except for medieval knights and they had to be careful not to fall
           over in case they could not get up. Drapeability, coupled with lightness, therefore ex-
           plains, to a great extent, the success of fibers for clothing and these are often the rea-
           sons why fibers find use in technical applications. However, this means that the nature
           of structures made from fibers is different from other structural materials. Cloth is a
           two-dimensional structure, which can easily take complex forms, bending in more
           than one plane to take the shape of a person or of a complex mold. Most other struc-
           tural materials are three dimensional and have to be worked to achieve the final desired
           form. In that context, the single fiber undergoes multiaxial mechanical loadings and
           complex fiberefiber contacts. From a fundamental point of view, some trivial ques-
           tions arise: How morphology and mechanical properties (and possible the related
           anisotropy) of the single fiber impacts on the response of the structure (i.e., the assem-
           bly)? What are the microstructural parameters responsible for fiber stiffness and/or
           tenacity? Because fiberefiber contacts are crucial for the interrelated characteristics
           of the assembly, what is the contribution of the fiber surface morphology? Even as fi-
           ber reinforced composite materials the composites are usually in the form of thin
           sheets. It also means that fibers are mostly used in tension as they usually buckle under
           compression and this makes characterizing fibers particularly challenging (Bunsell and
           Schwartz, 2000).
              As we have already seen, the fineness of fibers had led the fiber industry to develop
           its own units of measure, based on weight per unit length. Engineers working with bulk
           materials usually normalize characteristics by the cross-sectional area of the material.
           In this way, force to failure is converted into stress. The accurate measurement of the
           cross-sectional area of a single fiber, however, remains difficult. Through the years,



           Handbook of Properties of Textile and Technical Fibres. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-101272-7.00002-X
           Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45