Page 257 - Handbook of Structural Steel Connection Design and Details
P. 257

Welded Joint Design and Production

                    242   Chapter Three

                    The other three systems assume that at some point within the struc-
                    ture, plastic deformations will occur in members, thus absorbing seis-
                    mic energy. In this section, no attempt is being made to compare the
                    relative advantages of one system over another. Rather, the focus will
                    be placed on the demands on welded connections’ and member behav-
                    ior with respect to the various systems that may be selected by the
                    designer.
                      In the CBF system, the brace member is the one expected to be sub-
                    ject to inelastic deformations. The welded connections at the termina-
                    tion of a brace are subject to significant tension or compression loads,
                    although rotation demands in the connections are fairly low. Designs of
                    these connections are fairly straightforward, requiring the engineer to
                    develop the capacity of the brace member in compression and tension.
                    Recent experiences with CBF systems have reaffirmed the importance
                    of the brace dimensions (b/t ratio), and the importance of good details
                    in the connection itself. Problems seem to be associated with under-
                    sized welds, misplaced welds, missing welds, or welds of insufficient
                    throat due to construction methods. In order to place the brace into the
                    building frame, it is common to utilize a gusset plate welded into the
                    corners of the frame. The brace is slit along its longitudinal axis and
                    rotated into place. In order to maintain adequate dimensions for field
                    assembly, it is necessary to oversize the slot in the tube as compared to
                    the gusset. This results in natural gaps between the tube and the gus-
                    set plate. When this dimension increases, as illustrated in Fig. 3.24, it
                    is important to consider the effect of the root opening on the strength of
                                                                               1
                    the fillet weld. The D1.1 code requires that, for gaps exceeding  / in,
                                                                                16
                    the weld leg size be increased by the amount of the gap. This ensures
                    that a constant actual throat dimension is maintained.
                      EBFs and SMRFs are significantly different structural systems,
                    but from a welding design point of view, there are principles that
                    apply equally to both systems. It is possible to design an EBF so that
                    the “link” consists simply of a rolled steel member. In Fig. 3.25, these
                    examples are illustrated by the links designated as C1. In other EBF
                    systems, however, the connection itself can be part of the link, as




                                   Weld               Actual                Actual
                                  Throat   Gap        Throat   Gap          Throat






                    Figure 3.24  Effect of root openings (gaps) on fillet weld throat dimensions.
                    (Courtesy of The Lincoln Electric Company.)



                 Downloaded from Digital Engineering Library @ McGraw-Hill (www.accessengineeringlibrary.com)
                             Copyright © 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved.
                              Any use is subject to the Terms of Use as given at the website.
   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262