Page 293 - Handbook of Structural Steel Connection Design and Details
P. 293

Partially Restrained Connections

                    278   Chapter Four


                     M connection
                      M p,beam

                                     K i  ≥  20EI beam
                                   M p,beam  L beam M p,beam          Full strength (FS)
                        1.2

                        1.0
                                     K conn /M p,beam
                        0.8
                            FR                                       Partial strength (PS)
                        0.6

                                       PR
                        0.4
                                                   K i  ≥  2EI beam
                        0.2                      M p,beam  L beam M p,beam
                                                                                  3
                                            Simple                   Rotation (rad × 10 )
                                     10         20        30         40        50
                    Figure 4.3 Connection classification by stiffness, strength, and ductility.



                    is typically small. On the other hand, the deformations computed for
                    the ultimate strength case will probably not be very accurate, since
                    there can be very large deviations and the linear spring K  can only
                                                                           ult
                    be interpreted as an average. However, this approximation is proba-
                    bly sufficient for design purposes. Designers should be conscious that
                    no theoretical proof exists that a secant stiffness such as K  will pro-
                                                                           ult
                    vide a conservative result.
                      The stiffness of the connection is meaningful only when compared
                    to the stiffness of the connected members. For example, a connection
                    can be classified as rigid (Type FR) if the ratio ( ) of the connection
                    secant stiffness at service level loads (K  ) to the beam stiffness
                                                            serv
                    (EI/L), is greater than approximately 18 for unbraced frames.
                    Generally connections with   < 2 are regarded as pinned connections.
                    Limits on the ranges of   cannot be established uniquely because they
                    will vary depending on the limit state used to derive them. For regu-
                    lar frames, for example, one commonly used criterion to establish an
                    upper limit is that the reduction in elastic buckling capacity due to
                    the flexibility of the connections should not exceed 5% from that given
                    by an analysis assuming rigid connections (Eurocode 3, 1992).
                    Because this reduction in buckling capacity is tied to whether the
                    frame is braced or unbraced, the value of 20 is suggested for unbraced
                    frames, while a value of 8 is sufficient for braced frames. For continu-
                    ous beams in braced frames, on the other hand, limits based on




                 Downloaded from Digital Engineering Library @ McGraw-Hill (www.accessengineeringlibrary.com)
                             Copyright © 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved.
                              Any use is subject to the Terms of Use as given at the website.
   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298