Page 297 - Handbook of Structural Steel Connection Design and Details
P. 297

Partially Restrained Connections

                    282   Chapter Four

                                                                Bolt tension elongation
                                                                  Yielding of T flange
                                                                     Yielding of T web



                                                                              Shear tab
                                                                          Bolt hole
                                              K2   K3                     elongation
                                                                       Bolt slip
                                              K1
                                                   K4


                      (a) Steel connection       (b) Mechanistic model
                    Figure 4.5 Component model for a T-stub connection.




                    nonlinear characteristics. These springs are arranged in series or in
                    parallel and the overall M-  curve derived with the aid of simple
                    computer programs that conduct the analysis of the spring system.
                    Figure 4.5 shows a typical model for a T-stub connection. In this
                    example the K1 and K2 springs model the panel zone deformation
                    due to shear, while springs K3 and K4 model the bending deforma-
                    tions of the T stubs. Springs K3 and K4 are made up from the contri-
                    butions of several other springs that model different deformation
                    components (Fig. 4.5b).

                    4.2.5 Analysis

                    For many types of connections, the stiffness at the service load level
                    falls somewhere in between the fully restrained and simple limits,
                    and thus designers need to account for the PR behavior. The M-
                    characteristic can be obtained from experiments or models as
                    described in the previous section. The effect of PR connections on
                    both, force distribution and deformations in simple systems, will be
                    illustrated with two short examples.
                      Figure 4.6 shows the moments and deflections in a beam subjected
                    to a uniformly distributed load. The horizontal axis is logarithmic and
                    shows the ratio of the connection to beam stiffness (   K   L/EI).
                                                                             serv
                    The deformations rage from that of a simply supported beam (
                    5wL /384EI) for a very flexible connection (  → 0) to that of a fixed
                        4
                    beam (   wL /384EI) for a very stiff connection (  →  ). From both
                                  4
                    the deflection and force-distribution standpoints, for a range of 15 <
                    <   the behavior of the connection is essentially that of a fixed beam.



                 Downloaded from Digital Engineering Library @ McGraw-Hill (www.accessengineeringlibrary.com)
                             Copyright © 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved.
                              Any use is subject to the Terms of Use as given at the website.
   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302