Page 13 - How To Implement Lean Manufacturing
P. 13

xii   Pr ef a c e


                       Regarding the books on Lean, I find the materials to be in two categories.
                       First, some literature is just way too complicated for many to deal with, at least
                    regarding the initial phases of implementation. Although there is a reasonable amount
                    of good literature on Lean, some of it does not really reach the audience I am trying to
                    reach, such as those starving for information on “Just how do I implement this thing
                    called Lean?” For example, the best source of Lean information, for me, is Ohno’s book
                    (Ohno, 1988). I find it rich in both information and insights. But his book is a hard read.
                    It’s sometimes difficult to follow Ohno’s train of thought. In addition, he has the ability
                    to say some very powerful things in very simple sentences. As a result, the depth of his
                    statements often goes unnoticed by those just beginning their study of Lean or the
                    Toyota Production System (TPS). Thus, Ohno is often misunderstood. Worse, some of
                    what he says goes completely unnoticed by the novice. I am not sure who Ohno
                    characterizes as his audience, but he takes many things for granted that the typical
                    reader does not fully comprehend, especially if they are just beginning to research Lean.
                    For example, Ohno’s explanation of how quality was under control when they first
                                   ∗
                    launched the TPS  is not fleshed out fully enough for the novice. Such things make his
                    book, as well as Shingo’s, a bit ineffective with some readers (Shingo, 1989).
                       Still other books have been written by ex-Toyota personnel. Some of these books are
                    quite good yet many readers are unable to identify with them. I found this curious,
                    since usually books written by insiders are quite good. Nonetheless, I would get
                    comments from readers like, “Sounds good, but it’s not something we can do here,” or
                    other remarks about the ideas’ inapplicability, despite the fact that the system could
                    indeed be applied to their situation. Still, it prevented these people from using these
                    resources as they embarked on their own Lean journey—or worse yet, it prevented
                    them from even starting a Lean implementation. Hence, I have written this as a
                    simplified version of “How to Implement Lean,” complete with a methodology for
                    assessing a company’s needs, as well as a prescription for implementation.
                       The second intimidating factor about some of the literature has to do with the deep
                    cultural changes needed to fully implement Lean. For example, some people embarking
                    on a potential Lean journey will read about how the line operator is empowered—
                    actually required—to shut down production when problems occur. They then contrast
                    this to their facility where they see this outcome as a practical impossibility. The gap is
                    just too intimidating for them. Or perhaps they read about the belief that defects and
                    failures are seen as opportunities to improve production rather than as obstacles to
                    overcome, and they just cannot envision this idea as part of their culture. These are not
                    technical issues, they are cultural issues, and in some cases they will require huge
                    changes—changes larger than they can imagine. And so they become discouraged.
                       Make no mistake about it, these are powerful aspects of Lean, aspects that separate
                    it from other manufacturing philosophies, and aspects that should be sought after.
                       Again, make no mistake. Toyota, as well as others that developed these cultural
                    changes, spent a significant amount of effort and time on the process, and it came with
                    many bumps, bruises, and wrong-paths-taken. But these cultural changes were exactly
                    what was required—in fact, they are the reasons Ohno was so successful. He guided his
                    culture through the murky waters of change, and did so with skill.
                       These required cultural changes should be the reason people adopt, not avoid, a
                    Lean implementation effort.

                    ∗ See the section “It Is Not a Complete Manufacturing System” in Chap. 2.
   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18