Page 126 - Illustrated Pocket Dictionary of Chromatography
P. 126

METHOD VALIDATION     125

        diameter of a particle that can pass through it. Therefore, the number
        of meshes in the sieve is inversely proportional to the particle size it
        will allow to pass through. Two basic mesh scales are in use: US Stan-
        dard and Tyler. Some examples are given below:


                  US Standard        Eq. Particle Diameter (mm)
                   50                        300
                   80                        180
                  140                        106
                  270                         75
                  400                         38

        methanol, methyl alcohol Molecular weight: 32.0; boiling point:
        64.7°C; refractive index (20°C): 1.3284; density (20°C): 0.79g/mL;
                                                                o
        viscosity (20°C): 0.55cP; UV cutoff: 205nm; eluotropic strength (e ):
        on alumina—0.95, on silica—0.73; polarity index (P¢): 5.1; Hildebrand
        solubility parameter (d): 13.7. Miscible with water. Volatile and flam-
        mable. Methanol is a very commonly-used solvent in reversed phase
        LC and purge & trap GC.


                                  CH 3 OH
                                  Methanol

        method development The formalized process by which a set
        of separation criteria are determined such that with a defined set of
        parameters the same separation profile is achieved. The process of
        method development can be qualitative or quantitative. An effective
        method development protocol sets out well-defined success criteria,
        for example, minimum resolution between peaks, peak asymmetry
        and response factor ranges, minimum column efficiency (N), total
        analysis time, linearity, linear range, and reproducibility. The finished
        separation is optimized to meet all these criteria.

        method validation The process that follows method develop-
        ment and sets strict limits on the reproducibility, robustness, and
        ruggedness of the method. This validation process often includes mul-
        tiple sample preparations within one lab, matrix blank analysis (to
        ensure that there is no coeluting peak in the matrix that will interfere
        with the analyte of interest), multiple laboratory, analyst, and instru-
   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131