Page 231 - Improving Machinery Reliability
P. 231

202   Improving Machinery Reliability

                          Background:  Serious failures  of  fan spokes  (Le. central  hub arms) and fan
                        blades have been attributed to inadequate weld procedures, insufficient design
                        margins of safety, or both.
                      5. Vibration  cutout  devices should  incorporate  velocity-  or acceleration-based
                        solid-state circuitry,  a built-in  electronic delay circuit, and analog  outputs to
                        allow continuous monitoring and trend analysis. The automatic shutdown fea-
                        ture of the vibration monitoring device should energize to trip.
                          Background:  Some vibration  cutout  switches  furnished  by  cooling  tower
                        vendors are simple devices which have clearly demonstrated unsatisfactory ser-
                        vice  life and have failed to actuate under emergency conditions. Fires  and
                        severe mechanical  damage at several  locations have  been  attributed  to faulty
                        vibration cutout devices.
                      6. At one process plant, cyclone fences were place around the fan stacks after the
                        first blade failure sprayed debris over a wide area of  the unit.  These fences
                        entrapped  virtually  all significant pieces  of  subsequent  blade failures. Similar
                        fences should be placed around the fiberglass stacks of  cooling tower installa-
                        tions when using extra-large or unproven blade designs.
                    Cooling Tower Fan Mechanical Test  Example.  With  a  low-frequency
                    accelerometer  temporarily  clamped  to  a point  mid-span  on  the  airfoil  skin, each
                    blade is struck and the resulting frequency displayed on a digital frequency analyzer.
                    Observed values represent the blade static frequency f,,.  These values are recorded
                    for later comparison with a “safe design” criterion.
                      Knowledgeable vendors define “safe design” as





                      In this expression,  N is any integer from  I  to perhaps two times the number of
                    blades utilized in the fan. Rpm is the fan rpm, and fnd is the blade dynamic frequency.
                    This dynamic frequency fnd is related to the static frequency f,,  by the expression





                      The factor k  is experimentally determined by  the fan  vendor and  relates the
                    dynamic frequency to the static frequency.
                      In our example, k is given to be 1.5; the fan speed is  117 rpm. When we plug the
                    values for N and rpm into Equation (3-I), we find a “safe” value of fnd I445 cpm.
                    The highest permissible static frequency f,,  should therefore not exceed


                      fn, = J(445)’  - 1.5 (1 17)’                               (3 - 3)
                         = 421.3 cpm or 7.02 cps
   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236