Page 265 - Improving Machinery Reliability
P. 265

236   Improving Machinery Reliability

                      -On steam turbine driven compressors the “trip oil” dump valve should be modi-
                      fied to allow isolation in order to permit on-the-run testing of all trips and alarms.
                      -On motor driven compressors the “tripping relay” should have isolation provisions
                      to achieve the same testing function as on steam turbine driven compressors.
                      -On  steam turbines,  following any  shutdown  in which  alarm or tripping  circuit
                      instrumentation  could  have been  affected or after compressor  repairs  or  turn-
                      arounds, the turbine should be tripped once on “slow roll” to assure the operation
                      of the tripping circuit.
                      Lube oil analysis procedures might generally be adequate, but not up to the stan-
                      dards used by leading plants. In these plants, in addition to testing for H20, flash
                      point, viscosity and appearance, testing includes oxidation inhibitor and acid num-
                      ber in order to help assure longer life of bearings and seals.

                      Similarly, a few examples of  “machinery impact” observations and recommenda-
                    tions typically documented by an audit team are highlighted next:

                      Disc-pack couplings provided on pumps may not have a means for on-line inspec-
                      tion. Provisions for hinged covers or the retrofitting of expanded sheet metal win-
                      dows is recommended for the coupling guards of disc-pack couplings. Hinged or
                      expanded sheet metal covers facilitate visual inspection of couplings under opera-
                      tion through the use of a strobe light to “freeze” the coupling allowing observation
                      of disc “bowing” or other malfunctions that manifest themselves at speed and load.
                      Compressor trains are occasionally found with gear-type couplings that can limit
                      extended plant operation. A systematic program of planning for future conversion
                      to low-maintenance, high reliability dry-type couplings is sometimes advocated.
                      Pump failure experience at petrochemical plants always merits close review. Mea-
                      sures to upgrade mechanical seal selection and rolling element bearing procurement
                      are usually explained and an implementation schedule mapped out for the plant.
                      Based on field experience elsewhere, an audit team may consider hydro-pneumatic
                      governors  installed  on  large  steam turbines  a threat to long-term  reliability  of
                      major machinery. The technical reasons would have to be explained and electronic
                      governor retrofits recommended for future consideration. The cost basis for retrofit
                      application of electronic governors must be provided as part of the audit follow-up.

                      As a means of determining how the plant pursues chronic problems, an audit team
                    should use actual problems, when possible. This not only provides immediate assis-
                    tance, but  also provides  a means  of  demonstrating  failure analysis  concepts to an
                    audience “primed” for the results.
                      Addressing organizational means for improving machinery reliability usually con-
                    stitutes  the third phase of an audit. To further re-enforce the technical capability of a
                    client’s staff, audit teams often recommend and adapt to the needs of a specific facil-
                    ity three key techniques:

                      A detailed  role statement  typically  is developed  for the position  of  Equipment
                      Reliability Engineer. Experience shows that without this statement, the perceived
                      role is going to differ widely from person to person. While the individual slated for
   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270