Page 316 - Improving Machinery Reliability
P. 316

286    Improving Machinery Reliability

                      failure rate that is the reciprocal  of  MTBF)  for exponential  failure modes. Also
                      reliability may be the product of many different terms such as

                      R = Rutilities  * Rfeed plant * Rprocessing * Rpackaging * Rshipping

                      and  similar configurations.  To the user  of  a product, reliability  is measured  by
                      problem-free  operation (resulting in increased productive capability while requir-
                      ing fewer spare parts and less manpower for maintenance activities, which results
                      in lower costs). To the supplier of a product, reliability is measured by completing
                      a failure-free warranty period under specified operating conditions. Improving reli-
                      ability occurs at an increased  capital  cost but brings  with  it the expectation for
                      improving  availability,  decreasing downtime  and associated  maintenance costs,
                      improved secondary failure costs, and results in a better chance for making money
                      because the equipment is free from failures for longer periods of time.
                      Maintainability deals with duration of maintenance outages or how lung it takes to
                      achieve the maintenance actions compared to a datum. The key figure of merit is
                      often the mean time to repair  (MTTR), which measures the ease of  maintenance
                      upon failure. On a qualitative basis, it refers to the ease with which hardware or
                      software is restored to a functioning state. On a quantitative basis, it has probabili-
                      ties as described for availability and is measured based on the total downtime that
                      includes  all  diagnosis,  troubleshooting,  teardown,  removal/replacement,  active
                      repair time, verification that the repair is adequate, time delays for logistic move-
                      ments, and administrative maintenance delays. Maintainability is different than
                      repairability which is the probability a failed item is restored to operable condition
                      within a specified active repair time.
                      Capability deals with productive output compared to inherent productive  output,
                      which is a measure of how well the production activity is performed compared to
                      the datum. This index  measures the  systems capability to  perform  the intended
                      function on a system basis. Often the term is synonymous with productivity, which
                      is the product  of efficiency times utilization. Efficiency  measures the productive
                      work output versus the work input; whereas, utilization is the ratio of time spent on
                      productive efforts to the total time consumed.
                      Dependability is the product of reliability and maintainability. It measures how lung
                      things perform. Related issues about nonoperational influences are not included..

                       System effectiveness equations are helpful for understanding benchmarks, past, pre-
                     sent, and future status as shown in Figure 5-10 for understanding trade-off information.
                       The lower right-hand corner of Figure 5-10 brings much joy and happiness often
                     described as “bang for the buck.” The upper left-hand corner brings much grief. The
                     remaining two corners raise questions about worth and value. The system effective-
                     ness equation  is useful  for trade-off  studies as shown in the attached outcomes in
                     Figure 5-1 1.
                       System effectiveness  equations  have great impact on the LCC because  so many
                     decisions made in the early periods of  a project carve the value of LCC into stone.
                     About two thirds of the total LCC are fixed during project conception even though
   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321