Page 217 - Information and American Democracy Technology in the Evolution of Political Power
P. 217

P1: IBE/IRP/IQR/IRR
                          CY101-Bimber
                                        August 13, 2002
  CY101-05
            0 521 80067 6
                                   Political Individuals 12:12
                                                    8
              until the end of the ’80s, after which it fell. On the whole, such activi-
              ties certainly did not receive any major boost from the new information
              environment. No consequential gains in overall citizen knowledge oc-
                                                  9
              curred during the 1960s and ’70s, either. Like the second information
              regime, the third was a time of political disengagement by citizens from
              the voting booths, while fundamental changes in the nature of political
              intermediation were under way.
                 The first information revolution, on the other hand, was different in
              thisregard.Theriseofthenewspaperandthecreationofanationalsystem
              of political communication in the 1820s and ’30s was clearly a factor in
              soaring political participation rates. The sweep of citizens into the voting
              booths was faster and more abrupt than either of the great withdrawals
              would be in later periods. In this one case at least, a dramatic change in
              communication and information contributed both to a transformation
              in the nature of political intermediation and an impetus for citizens to
              become better engaged in democracy.
                 None of these prior information revolutions provides a particularly
              strong case for what might happen in the contemporary period. There
              are precedents in the prior developments for information expanding,
              growing more complex and more widely distributed, but none where
              information and communication also became less costly and so very
              widely accessible and controllable by citizens. The kind of information
              abundance evolving now is new, and history does not provide clear
              precedents where questions about individual behavior and engagement
              are concerned.


                             THEORETICAL CONSIDERATIONS
              The classical approach to framing theoretical expectations about
              information and individual levels of engagement might be called
              “instrumental.” This approach is dominated by rational choice theory,
              but not limited to it. In this tradition, changes in the cost and variety of
              sources of information directly affect levels of political participation. As in-
              formation grows less costly and is provided by a greater variety of sources
              over which individuals have control, more citizens are likely to become

              8
                Steven J. Rosenstone and John Mark Hansen, Mobilization, Participation, and Democ-
                racy in America (New York: Macmillan, 1993); Stanley and Niemi, Vital Statistics on
                American Politics.
              9
                Michael X. Delli Carpini and Scott Keeter, What Americans Know about Politics and
                Why It Matters (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1996).

                                            200
   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222