Page 218 - Information and American Democracy Technology in the Evolution of Political Power
P. 218

P1: IBE/IRP/IQR/IRR
                                          August 13, 2002
              0 521 80067 6
                            CY101-Bimber
                                                         12:12
   CY101-05
                                Theoretical Considerations
              engaged with politics. The centerpiece of this approach is the Downsian
              modelofpoliticalrationality.Asaclassicofpoliticalscience, AnEconomic
              Theory of Democracy is indeed as much a theory of political information
              as it is a theory of political behavior. In Anthony Downs’s work, and
              in most of the work in the rational tradition, information is central to
              behavior because uncertainty is central. If one assumes as Downs does
              that uncertainty is a basic force in human affairs, then the acquisition
              and use of information to reduce uncertainty is an elemental feature of
              all human activity as well. 10  In the classical formulation, “coping with
              uncertainty is a major function of nearly every significant institution in
              society” 11  as well as a major activity of the political individual. At the
              same time, “most uncertainty is removable through the acquisition of
              information.” 12
                Another feature of the rational model is the observation that infor-
              mation is costly. In the Downsian view, information costs are of two
              types: those associated with the acquisition of information – namely,
              the time, effort, and material resources needed to learn information rel-
              evant to a political goal – and those associated with its evaluation in
              the mind of the individual. The role of information in political activity
              is therefore subject to a law of diminishing marginal returns. In the-
              ory, “the information-seeker continues to invest resources in procuring
              data until the marginal return from information equals its marginal
              cost.” 13  In practice, though, the situation is made slightly more com-
              plex by the fact that citizens’ strength of preference varies. A citizen
              who is highly committed to a particular candidate or issue has little
              incentive to acquire information, since it is unlikely that any new in-
              formation would alter his or her preferences. At the same time, Downs
              argues, a citizen who is uncertain and indifferent and who therefore
              could learn the most from a marginal increase in information may
              nonetheless be held back from obtaining it by ex ante indifference over
              outcomes.
                Interestingly enough, a good deal of political science outside the
              rational choice tradition also approaches the relationship between infor-
              mation and participation in ways that are generally consistent with the
              rationalapproach,ifnotsoexplicitandwelldeveloped.Theclaimthatthe
              cost of political information could directly affect levels of participation


              10
                Anthony Downs, An Economic Theory of Democracy (New York: Harper and Brothers,
                1957).
              11           12            13
                Ibid., p. 13.  Ibid., p. 77.  Ibid., p. 215.
                                            201
   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223