Page 56 - Information and American Democracy Technology in the Evolution of Political Power
P. 56

P1: IPI/IBE/IRR/GYQ
                                          August 13, 2002
              0 521 80067 6
                            CY101-Bimber
                                                         10:39
   CY101-02
                         The Information Theory of The Federalist
              and communication has largely escaped notice. An important part of
              the response to the size objection comes from Hamilton in 84, who ob-
              serves that in the smallest democracies of just the sort that Montesquieu
              and the Anti-Federalists advocate, important obstacles still exist to the
              kind of direct, mutual observation between citizens and government that
              Cato and Centinel presuppose. In neither small nor large democracies,
              Hamilton notes, can citizens and government officials exchange infor-
              mation directly and fully. Choosing Montgomery County as an example,
              he points out that even in a jurisdiction of this size, the flow of political
              information requires informed citizens to rely upon “the public prints,”
              correspondence, and communication with others if they are to attend to
              the affairs of government. Less-informed citizens must in turn rely upon
              the better-informed. Therefore, political communication and the flow
              of information will always be mediated, even in the smallest of states.
              Establishing the principle of mediated information flow, regardless of
              the size of government, lays the foundation for overcoming the problem
              of scale.
                For Hamilton, the mediation of political information is more than a
              technicalnecessity.Itispoliticallydesirablebecauseitpermitsthefiltering
              and aggregation of local communication, as well as the building of larger
              views and a synthetic body of national-scale political information. The
              informational tasks of central government are to aggregate information
              in such a way that a useful synthesis results, in which the informational
              whole is greater and wiser than the sum of the individual facts about
              local problems. In the construction of a national view of problems, it is
              useful that some local details recede into the background – a point of
              view that was an anathema to Anti-Federalists.
                One step in the process of mediating and synthesizing information
              involves elected officials learning about problems outside their own con-
              stituencies.HereMadisontakesuptheargument: “Whilstafewrepresen-
              tatives, therefore, from each State, may bring with them a due knowledge
              of their own state, every representative will have much information to
                                                11
              acquire concerning all the other States.” Hamilton claims that the state
              governments have an important role to play in the flow of information
              becausetheycanserveasinformationaggregators,standingbetweenlocal
              problems and the larger national view. In the proposed system of govern-
              ment, local information is to be assembled into state-level information
              in the state governments. The state governments would then bring to the

              11
                The Federalist, p. 381.
                                            39
   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61