Page 240 - Inorganic Mass Spectrometry - Fundamentals and Applications
P. 240

226                                                         Smith


                We start with the following  equation:
                      Ni   Nis 3-  Nit
                 R,=-=
                     Nk   Nks  + Nkt
            This is simply  the ratio of isotope i (sample)  to  isotope k (tracer  or  spike)  in the
            mixture of the  two  as measured by the mass spectrometer.  Each isotope has a con-
            tribution  from each component of the mixture.
                 Because  we  want  the  concentration of the total  element  and  not just that of
            a single  isotope,  we  modify the equation  to include the total  number of atoms in
            the  sample:




            A few  algebraic  steps to solve for N, yield

                     N'(ait  -
                 N, =
                      ('~aks  - ais)
             emanging  terns gives  an  expression  in  terms of isotope  ratios:





                 Recall that Ns and Nt are  the  numbers of atoms in the mixture due to  sample
            and  tracer,  respectively. To convert them to weight  requires use of the familiar Avo-
            gadro  relationship  and involves multiply~ng both  sides of the equation by 1 .O twice,
            thereby  introducing  the  atomic  weights of sample  and  tracer  (i.e.,  multiply each
            side by AJA, and AIA,). Note  that  Avogadro's  number  appears on both  sides of the
            equation  and  cancels  out.  A, and A,, on the  other  hand,  are  not  equal and do not
            cancel. The resulting  equation is one  form of the isotope dilution  equation.





            In terms of concentration:




                 This  formulation is only  one of several  that,  although  differing  in  notation
            and  in  formulation of the  collection of R terms,  are  algebraically  identical. The
            most co~on formulation  seems to use Eq, (5.4) as the  starting  point for conver-
            sion from atomic  units  to  weight;  see, for example,  Faure [6] and  Jarvis et al.  [7].
   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245