Page 243 - Inorganic Mass Spectrometry - Fundamentals and Applications
P. 243

Mass
          Isotope ~~~ut~on Spectrometry                                229
          fortunately,  however,  low  abundance  and  high  enrichment equate to high cost, fre-
                                                               is
          quently  making the best  solution  impracticable;  in  cases  where  cost prohibitive,
          another  stable  isotope of greater  natural  abundance  than  that of the  smallest  must
          be chosen. It is for this reason, for example,  that  enriched  42Ca (0.65% natural
          abundance)  and %2a (2.09%) are  more  often  used  than  46Ca (0.004%); the cost of
                                              of
          enriched  46Ca is many  times  higher  than  that the  other  isotopes.
              All of  the  considerations  discussed  lead  naturally to the question of  what
          price  the  analyst  pays for this  less-than-ideal  spikeisample ratio. In  most  cases,
          error in  the  measurement of Rm makes the largest  contribution to analytical  uncer-
          tainty; the isotopic compositions of sample  and  spike  are  usually  well  known  in
          comparison to R,.  The matter of error  propagation  in  isotope  dilution  analyses  has
          been  extensively  treated by Adriaens et al., [ 131, and  Patterson et al.  used  Monte
          Carlo simulation to study the problem [14].  Using  propagation of  error laws,
          Heumann  derived the following  relationship  with  which to calculate Itopt, the op-
          timum  spike-to-sample ratio (neglecting cost and  availability)  [S]:



          where the terms  are  as  defined for Eq. (5.7). The factor by  which  error is multi-
          plied for given  isotopic  enrichments is illustrated for thallium  in  Fig.  5.2. Tnspec-
          tion of Fig. 5.2 reveals  that  relatively  large  deviations  from the optimum  sample-
          to-spike ratio can  be  tolerated  in most analyses; in addition, the greater the
          enrichment of the  spike  isotope,  the less sensitive  the  analysis is to deviation  from
          optimum.  With  spikes of 80% or more  enrichment  in  203Tl,  sample-to-spike  ratios
          from 0.1 to 10.0 should  give  acceptable  results.  In  critical  applications  where  highly
          accurate  concentration  measurements  are  desired, is advisable to obtain  an  esti-
                                                  it
          mate of the  sample  concentration to use  in dete~ning how  much  spike  to  add.
          This analysis, of course,  need  not be by isotope  dilution  mass  spectrometry;  a  less
          time-consuming  and less expensive  method  would  be  preferred  in  most  cases.
              Enriched  stable  isotopes for use  as  spikes are available from several  sources;
          Oak Ridge  National  Laboratory  sells  them for most  solid  elements [ 151.







          The literature on  isotope  dilution is so voluminous  that it is impossible to cover
                                           It
          the subject  thoroughly  in  a  single  chapter. is in fact tantamount to impossible to
          locate all relevant  papers, let alone  read  them. There are  also  questions  arising  from
          the  definition of “inorganic.”  Elemental  assay  has  traditionally  been  an  inorganic
          discipline and  analysis  of,  say,  body  fluids  biological. The question is where, for
          example,  to  place  analysis lead  in  human  serum. The area into which  such  analy-
                              of
          ses  fall  depends  on  whether is the analyte or the  sample that is used for the  def-
                                it
   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248