Page 212 - Inside the Film Factory New Approaches to Russian and Soviet Cinema
P. 212

11

                Ideology as mass entertainment: Boris
                 Shumyatsky and Soviet cinema in the
                                        1930s

                                     Richard Taylor






                 A film and its success are directly  linked  to the degree of
                 entertainment in the plot…that is why we are obliged to require our
                 masters to produce works that have strong plots and are organised
                 around a story-line.
                                                    Boris Shumyatsky, 1933 1

            The conventional approach to Soviet cinema looks at the films produced almost
            exclusively in terms of the men who directed them: Eisenstein, Pudovkin, Vertov
            head a long, and lengthening, list of what  film  critics and historians would,
            borrowing from  their  French counterparts, nowadays  call  auteurs. Yet  our
            approach to Hollywood, which is both more familiar to us, and more influential
            over us, is rather  different:  the auteur theory persists  in  the discussion of  such
            important individual directors as Alfred Hitchcock or John Ford but we are much
            more prepared to  concede that a film is the  result of a  variety  of influences,
            perhaps even of a collective effort–at best a collective work of art, at worst a mere
            industrial commodity destined for mass consumption. In the Hollywood context,
            therefore, we talk of a studio style or of the influence of a producer like David
            O.Selznick.  We  group American films according to their  scriptwriter (Jules
            Furthman or Clifford Odets), their genre (the western, the musical, the war film) or
            their star (Marlene Dietrich, Marilyn Monroe, James Dean). But we never apply
            these criteria to Soviet cinema.
            There are, of course, good historical (and ideological) reasons for this: one of the
            principal reasons is quite simply lack of adequate information. But, if we do not ask
            different  questions, we  shall never get different answers or,  indeed, much new
            information at all. In concentrating exclusively on directors, our approach to Soviet
            cinema lacks an important dimension. We ignore the different styles that emanate
            from different studios and we ignore the role of a man like Adrian Piotrovsky, head
            of the script department of the Leningrad studios in the early 1930s, in creating a
            studio style. We ignore the threads of continuity in the work of a scriptwriter like
            Mikhail Bleiman, whose first script was filmed in 1924 and who was still active in
            the 1970s, or Nina Agadzhanova-Shutko, who scripted films for both Eisenstein
            (The Battleship Potemkin, 1926) and Pudovkin (The Deserter, 1933). We ignore
   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217