Page 172 - Instrumentation Reference Book 3E
P. 172

156  Particlesizing

            where X is the mean free path and b depends on   be  confused with  extinction coefficient E.  If  the
            the fluid (e.g., for air at s.t.p. dry, b E 1.7).   transmission intensity of a beam of light changes
                                                     from IO to It in a path length L
            11.4  Optical effects caused by              ZT/JO  = EL
            particles                                where K is contained within E.
                                                       Extinction  In Zo1It  is the Napierian  equivalent
            When light passes through  a suspension of  par-   of optical density.
            ticles,  some is  absorbed,  some  scattered  and  a   Although the value of K has been shown to be
            proportion is unaffected, the relative proportions   virtually 2, the scattering angle for larger particles
            depending on the particle size, the wavelength of   ( -30pm)  is  small  and  about  half  the  light  is
            the light, and the refractive indices of the media.   forward-scattered.  It  follows that  depending  on
            The molecules of the fluid also scatter light.   the observation  distance and the size of the sen-
              Some optical  size-analysis methods  infer  size   sor, much of the forward-scattered light could be
            from measurements of the transmitted, i.e., unaf-   received and the effective value of K in the above
            fected light,  others  measure  the  scattered  light.   expression could be as low as 1. It will be apparent
            Some operate on suspensions of particles, others   that  the  effect  of  a  distribution  of  particles  on
            on individual particles.                 light transmission is not a simple function of  the
              The  theory  of  light-scattering  by  particles  is   projected area.
            complicated. Rayleigh’s treatment. which applies   Bearing in mind the above limitations on K, it
            only  to  particles  whose  diameter  d <<  X  (the   is possible to estimate the transmitted light inten-
            wavelength), shows that the intensity of scattered   sity through  a  distribution of  particles by  sum-
            light is proportional  to d61X4. It also shows that   ming the  area concentrations  within size bands.
            the  scattering  intensity varies with  the  observa-   In  each band  of  mean  diameter  d, the  effective
            tion  angle and this also depends on d. As  size d   area alA is  1.5 KcLlpd, where  c is the mass con-
            approaches A,  however. the more rigorous treat-   centration, L is the optical path length, and p is
            ment of Mie indicates that the scattering intensity   the particle density.
            becomes proportional  to  d2, i.e.,  particle  cross-
            sectional area, but that the effective area is differ-
            ent  from  the  geometrical  area  by  a  factor  K,   11.5  Particle shape
            known  as the  scattering coefficient or efficiency
            factor, which incorporates d; X and the refractive   Although we can attribute to a particle an equiva-
            index. Where d (< X the two theories are similar.   lent diameter,  for example a  Fer&t diameter  dF,
            In the region around d = A,  however, K oscillates   this  does not  uniquely  define the  particle.  Two
            (typically  between  about  1.5  and  5)  tending   particles with the same Feret diameter can have a
            towards a mean of 2. Beyond about d = 5X, the   very different shape. We can say that the volume
            value of K becomes virtually 2, Le., the effective   of an equivalent sphere is
            cross-sectional area of a particle is twice the geo-   7l
            metrical area. As dlX  increases the preferred scat-
            tering  angle  reduces  and  becomes more  distinct   6(dF)3
            and forward scattering predominates (diffraction).   but we must recognize that the actual volume Vis
              If the light is not monochromatic, the oscilla-   probably very different. Heywood has proposed
            tion of K is smoothed to a mean of about 2.   the  use  of  shape  coefficients. We  can  assign  a
              The ratio of the intensity of the transmitted light   coefficient CXY,F to a particle such that
            IT to the incident light lo is given by the Lambert-
            Beer law
                -- exp (-K:                           Thus, if  we  use  another method  of  size analysis
                IT
                  -
                Io                                    which in fact measures particle volume V, know-
            where a is the total projected area of the particles   ing dF we can calculate QV,F.  Similarly, by meas-
                                                      uring  particle  surface  area  S, we  can  assign  a
            in the light beam, A is the area of the beam, and   coefficient QS,F  so that
            again K is the scattering coefficient. This is often
            simplified to
                optical density D = log,,,  Zo/l~     OI~’.F is called the volume shape coefficient (based
                              = 0.4343K(a/A)          on Fer&t diameter) and (YS,F is called the surface
                                                      shape coefficient (based on Feret diameter).
            The scattering coefficient is sometimes called the   Clearly, there are other shape coefficients, and
            “particle extinction coefficient.” This should not   they can be associated with other diameters.
   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177