Page 536 - Instrumentation Reference Book 3E
P. 536

Introduction  519

             revealed by conducting a statistical analysis on a   21.1.1.1  Rndicsartive rieeccn,
             series of repeated measurements. For errors in the
             equipmenit or in the way it is operated the analysis   Radioactive sousces have the property of disinte-
                                                      grating in a purely random manner, and the rate
             uses  the  same  source,  and  for  source  errors  a   of decay is given by the law
             number of sources are used.
              While statistical errors will follow a Gaussian
             distribution, errors which are not random will not                        (22.8)
             foilow  such a distribution.  so that if  a  series of
             measurements cannot be fitted to a Gaussian dis-   where X is called the decay constant and N is the
             tribution curve then non-random errors must be   total  number  of  radioactive  atoms present  at  zi
             present.  The  chi-squared  test  allows one to test   time t. This may be expressed as
             the goodness of fit of a series of observations to   N  = iV0 exp (-At)   (22.9)
             the Gaussian distribution. If non-random  errors
             are not  present,  then  the values  of  x'  as deter-   where No is the number  of  atoms of  the parent
             mined  by  the  relation  given  in  equation  (22.7)   substance present at some arbitrary time zero.
             should  lie  between  the  limits  quoted  in  Table   Combining these equations we have
             22.3 for various groups of observations:     dN
                                                         - - --AN0 exp (-At)          (22.10)
                                                             --
                                                          dt
                                                      showing that the rate of decay falls off exponentially
                                              (22.7)   with time. It is usually more convenient to describe
                                                      thedecay in terms ofthe "half-life" T+ oftheelement.
             where ri  is the average count observed.  11;  is the   This is the time required for the acfivity, dNldt, to
             number  counted  in the  ith  observation  and q is   fall to half its initial value and X  = O.693/Ti.
             the nuniber of observations.  If a series of obser-   When two or more radioactive  substahces are
             vations fits a Gaussian distribution then there is   present in a source the calculation of the decay of
             a  95 percent  probability  that x2 will  be  greater   each isotope becomes more complicated and will
             than or equal to the lower limit quoted in Table   not be dealt with here.
             22.1, but only a 5 percent probability that y2 will   The  activity  of  a  source  is  a  measure  of the
             be  greater  than  or  equal  to  the  upper  limit   frequency of disintegration occurring in it. Activ-
             quoted. Thus, for ten observations, if x2 lies out-   ity is measured in Becquerels (Bq), one
             side the region of 22.33-16.92  it is very probable   corresponding to one disintegration per  second.
             that errors of a non-random  kind are present.   The old unit, the Curie (Ci), is still often used and
              In applying the chi-squared test the number of   1 Megabecquerel = 0.027 millicuries.
             counts  recorded  in  each  observation  should  be   It is also often important to consider the radia-
             large  enough  to  make  the  statistical  error  less   tion  that  has  been  absorbed--the  dose.  This  is
             than the accuracy required for the activity deter-   quoted  in Grays, the gray being defined as that
             mination. Thus, if  10,000 counts are recorded for   dose (of any ionizing radiation) which imparts  I
             each observation, and for a series of observations   joule of energy per kilogram of absorbing matter
             y2 lies between the expected limits, it can be con-   at the place of  iiiterest. So 1 Gy = 9 J kg-l.  The
             cluded  that  non-random errors of  a magnitude   older unit, the rad, a hundred times smaller than
             greater than about A2 percent are not present.   the gray, is still often referred to.

             Table 22.3  Limits of the quantity yz for sets of  counts
             with random errors                       22.1.2  Classification of detectors
             Number. of     Lower limit    L$pcr  limit   Various  features  of  detectors are important and
             observations   for xz        for h'2     have to be taken into account when deciding the
                                                      choice of a particular system, notably
             3               0.103         5.99
             4               0.352         7.81       (1)  cost;
             5               0.711         9.49       (2) Sizes available;
             6               1.14          11.07      (3)  Complexity in auxiliary electronics needed;
             7               1.63          12.59      (4)  Ability to measure energy and/or discriminate
             8               2.17          14.07         between various different types of radiations
             9               2.73          15.51         or particles;
             10              3.33          16.92      (5) Efficiency, defined  as  the  probability  of  ai1
             15              6.57          23.68
             20             10.12          30.14         incident particle being recorded.
             25             13.85          36.41        Detectors  can  be  grouped  generally into  the
             30             17.71          42.56      classes listed below. Most of these are covered in
   531   532   533   534   535   536   537   538   539   540   541