Page 70 - Instrumentation Reference Book 3E
P. 70

Derived measurements  55

            itself. The same concept is often applied using mul-
             tiple electronic sensors placed in line or by stepping
             a fixed interval along the whole distance, counting
             the number of coarse intervals, and subdividing the
             last partial interval by some other sensor that has
             finer sensing detail.
              When  a  non-contacting  sensor  is  used  (see
             Figure  3.3), the length measurement  is made  by
             a method that does not mechanically contact the
             subject. An example is the use of an optical inter-
             ferometer to monitor position of a machine slide.
             It does not impose significant force on the slide
             and, as such. does not alter the measured value by
             its presence.
              Contacting  methods  must  be used  with  some
             caution lest they alter the measurement value due
             to  the mechanical  forces  imposed  by  their  pre-
             sence.


              .3 Derived measurements

             3.3.1  Derived from length measurement alone
             Length (m) comes into other measurement  par-
             ameters, including relative length change (mlm),
             area  (m2>, volume  (m3), angle  (dm), velocity   X J
             (m-'),  and acceleration (m-*). To measure posi-
             tion, several coordinate systems can be adopted.
             Figure 3.4 shows those commonly used. In each
             instance  the  general  position  of  a  point  P will
             need  three  measurement  numbers,  each  being
             measured by separate sensing channels.
               The Cartesian (or rectangular) system shown in
             Figure 3.4(a) is that most adopted for ranges less
             than a few tens of meters. Beyond that absolute
             size  it  becomes  very  difficult  to  establish  an
             adequately  stable  and  calibratable  framework.
             Errors cain arise from lack of right angles between
             axes, from errors of length sensing along an axis.
             and from the imperfection of projection out from
             an axis to the point.
               The  polar  system  of  Figure  3.4(b)  avoids
             the  need  for  an  all-encompassing  framework,
             replacing  that  problem  with  the  practical  need
             for a reference base from which two angles and a
             length are determined. Errors arise here in defin-
             ition of the two angles and in the length measure-   C    (c)
             ment which, now, is not restricted to a slide-way.   Figure 3.4  Coordinate systems that can be used to
             Practical  angle  measurement  reaches  practical   locate position in space. (a) Cartesian, rectangular, frame
             and  cost  barriers  at  around  one  arc-second  of   for three lengths. (b) Two polar directions and a length.
             discrimination. This method is well suited to such   (c) Triangulated lengths from a base triangle.
             applications as radar tracking of aircraft or plot-
             ting of location under the sea.
               The  above two  systems of  coordinate  frame-   measured  from a  triangle  formed  of  three fixed
             work  are those mostly adopted. A third alterna-   lengths. Errors arise only in the three length meas-
             tive. which is less used, has, in principle, the least   urements with respect to the base triangle and in
             error sources. This is the triangular system shown   their  definition  in  space.  Where  two  or  more
             as Figure 3.4(c). In this method three lengths are   points  in  space are to  be monitored,  then  their
   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75