Page 297 -
P. 297

Master Data       279



                           Because several BOMs can exist for the same material, the ERP system
                       must have a method to determine which BOM to use. The BOM selection
                       method in the material master identifi es the criteria the system should use to
                       select the BOM. Examples of criteria are lot size and validity date.


                       Availability Check Group
                       The availability check group defi nes the strategy the system uses to deter-
                       mine whether a quantity of material will be available on a specifi c date. The
                       most common method, called available-to-promise (ATP), considers a broad
                       range of elements representing both the supply of and demands for the
                       material. Supply elements include existing inventory, purchase requisitions,
                       purchase orders, and production orders. Demand elements include mate-
                       rial reservations, safety stock, and sales orders. The availability check group
                       informs the system which supply and demand elements to take into account
                       when determining availability. Because material availability is a concern in
                       many parts of an organization, the availability check group is used by multiple
                       processes. For example, the fulfi llment process uses it to ensure that materials
                       can be delivered to a customer on the requested delivery date, and the produc-
                       tion process uses it to ensure that materials are available before production
                       orders are released.

                       Strategy Group

                       Strategy group specifi es the high-level planning strategy used in production.
                       Production planning strategies fall into three broad categories: make-to-stock,
                       make-to-order, and assemble-to-order. We introduced the fi rst two strategies
                       in Chapter 6, in the context of the production process. Business Processes in
                       Practice 6-2 in that chapter presents examples of how Dell and Apple use
                       make-to-order and make-to-stock strategies, respectively. In this section, we
                       will extend the discussion of these planning strategies.
                           In the make-to-stock (MTS)  strategy customer orders are fulfi lled from
                       an existing inventory of fi nished goods. The MTS strategy is usually employed
                       by fi rms that produce a high volume of identical products. This strategy reduces
                       the time required to fi ll customer orders because there is no need to wait
                       until the materials are produced. In addition, it enables the company to  produce
                       goods at a constant rate and in optimum lot sizes, regardless of customer demand.
                       In SAP ERP the simplest make-to-stock strategy is net requirements planning
                       (strategy 10), in which the system generates procurement proposals based on
                       calculated PIRs without regard to CIRs.
                           A common variation to the make-to-stock strategy is planning with fi nal
                       assembly (strategy 40).  This strategy is also based on PIRs. Unlike the
                       pure MTS strategy, however, this approach takes into account actual sales
                       orders through a procedure called  consumption.  We discuss consumption
                       modes in the next section.
                           In contrast to MTS, in a make-to-order (MTO)  strategy the produc-
                       tion of the fi nished goods and any needed semi-fi nished goods is triggered by
                       a sales order. The company does not maintain an inventory of these mate-
                       rials. MTO is also referred to as sales-order-based production. In contrast to
                       MTS, MTO is used when each product is unique. For example, if GBI intro-
                       duced a line of high-end racing bikes designed specifi cally for individual riders,







                                                                                                                 31/01/11   6:42 AM
          CH008.indd   279                                                                                       31/01/11   6:42 AM
          CH008.indd   279
   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302