Page 278 - Materials Chemistry, Second Edition
P. 278

L1644_C06.fm  Page 251  Monday, October 20, 2003  12:06 PM











                                    TABLE 6.6
                                    Eco-Matrix with Life-Cycle Inventory Data for Selected Environmental Loads,
                                    Divided into Those Assessable by Environmental Costs and Those Responsible
                                    for Ecosystem Damages and Global Warming (Current Situation)
                                                                                      Scrap-
                                     Relevant                                 Ash      metal
                                     Process  Electricity  Transport  CaO   treatment  recycling  Incineration
                                    Region    Spain     Tarragona/  Tarragona/  Tarragona  Madrid/  Tarragona
                                                         Catalonia  Catalonia         Spain
                                    kWh       2.96 ¥ 10 3  0.00  0.00       0.00     0.00      0.00
                                    tkm       0.00      2.64 ¥ 10 4  0.00   0.00     0.00      0.00
                                              2.08      8.45     1.11 ¥ 10 2  4.73   6.03      2.82 ¥ 10 1
                                    kg PM 10
                                    kg As     3.12 ¥ 10 –4  2.93 ¥ 10 –3  3.74 ¥ 10 –4  8.66 ¥ 10 –4  2.09 ¥ 10 –3  3.29 ¥ 10 –2
                                    kg Cd     6.97 ¥ 10 –4  4.28 ¥ 10 –4  4.74 ¥ 10 –5  1.41 ¥ 10 –4  3.06 ¥ 10 –4  3.87 ¥ 10 –2
                                    kg Ni     1.29 ¥ 10 –4  5.56 ¥ 10 –3  1.31 ¥ 10 –3  2.42 ¥ 10 –3  3.98 ¥ 10 –3  4.93 ¥ 10 –2
                                    kg VOC    4.74 ¥ 10 –1  1.68 ¥ 10 1  5.84 ¥ 10 –1  4.86  1.21 ¥ 10 1  0.00
                                    ng Dioxins   8.05 ¥ 10 1  7.32 ¥ 10 2  3.83 ¥ 10 2  7.57 ¥ 10 2  5.22 ¥ 10 2  1.17 ¥ 10 4
                                    TEQ
                                    kg CO     3.36 ¥ 10 –1  2.92 ¥ 10 1  2.46  1.16 ¥ 10 1  2.09 ¥ 10 1  2.35 ¥ 10 2
                                              1.86 ¥ 10 1  1.93 ¥ 10 1  1.16 ¥ 10 1  1.17 ¥ 10 1  1.38 ¥ 10 1  1.77 ¥ 10 2
                                    kg SO 2
                                              3.30      9.31 ¥ 10 1  5.76   3.17 ¥ 10 1  6.65 ¥ 10 1  1.12 ¥ 10 3
                                    kg NO 2
                                              1.48 ¥ 10 3  9.13 ¥ 10 3  8.02 ¥ 10 3  5.76 ¥ 10 3  6.53 ¥ 10 3  2.25 ¥ 10 5
                                    kg CO 2
                                    kg dichloro-  9.90 ¥ 10 –7  3.17 ¥ 10 –6  5.64 ¥ 10 –7  1.11 ¥ 10 –6  2.26 ¥ 10 –6  0.00
                                    methane
                                    kg Halon-  2.27 ¥ 10 –5  1.09 ¥ 10 –3  3.61 ¥ 10 –5  3.21 ¥ 10 –4  7.80 ¥ 10 –4  0.00
                                    1301
                                    kg methane  4.51    1.41 ¥ 10 1  7.57   8.19     1.01 ¥ 10 1  0.00
                                    kg N 2 O  1.27 ¥ 10 –2  1.00  3.55 ¥ 10 –2  2.75 ¥ 10 –1  7.16 ¥ 10 –1  0.00
                                    kg        3.03 ¥ 10 –7  1.03 ¥ 10 –5  6.41 ¥ 10 –6  3.78 ¥ 10 –6  7.36 ¥ 10 –6  0.00
                                    tetrachloro-
                                    methane
                                    kg trichloro-  1.55 ¥ 10 –8  1.10 ¥ 10 –6  7.06 ¥ 10 –7  4.03 ¥ 10 –7  7.83 ¥ 10 –7  0.00
                                    methane


                                    6.8.6  DAMAGE PROFILE
                                    The multiplication of the damage-assigning matrices with the eco-technology matrix
                                    (the respective parts of the inventory table) yields the damage profile (see Table 6.10
                                    for the current situation), i.e., the ensemble of the three damage parameters, per
                                    functional unit. In the weighted eco-technology matrix or damage matrix for the
                                    current situation, the external environmental cost per functional unit is estimated as
                                    28,200 U.S.$/TJ electricity, which is in the range of other externality studies for
                                    waste incineration (Rabl et al., 1998; CIEMAT, 1997). That is the sum of the diagonal
                                    corresponding to the sum of the regions considered in the life-cycle study, here
                                    called life-cycle region. It becomes clear that the damage generated by the functional
                                    unit would be higher if all the processes were in the UWM and less if they were all
                                    in the Tarragona region (situated on the Mediterranean coast). In the case of the


                                    © 2004 CRC Press LLC
   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283