Page 412 - Integrated Wireless Propagation Models
P. 412

390    C h a p t e r   S i x


               When both transmitter and receiver antennas are the same polarization, we have the
               simple expression for the large-scale transfer function:
                                                                   e -jk  r, }
                                A
                                             e -jkro
                                      {  Dir  Dir
                                                              ref  ref
                         (
                                  g g
                                                              r
                                                  +  R
                      HLS  f,   - t) - 27t  T R  <Jlr   <I>R  ----r;  P  vert snwotlt <l> <I>R ---r;;-  (6.7.3.1.4)
                  Where gr and g are the maximum field gains of transmitting and receiving anten­
                               R
                     ;
                           ;,
               nas; <I>?' and <1>� are complex valued functions describing amplitude/phase variation of
               the field radiation diagram of these transmitted and received antennas over a direct
               path. Similarly, <1>1 and <1>1 are complex valued functions related to the transmitted and
               received antennas over a reflected path, and R vertsmoo u, is the smooth earth reflection coef­
               ficient in vertical polarization depending on grazing angle and dielectric (£, cr) param­
               eters of the ground.49
                  p i s the reduction factor due to ground roughness as
                                              { 1 (  �hsina)2}
                                        p = e xp  - 2    4 1t                   (6.7.3.1.5)
                                                         'A
               The received signal power is

                                                                                (6.7.3.1.6)
               The global transmitter losses Lr are calculated by taking the transmitter antenna vertical elec­
               tric dipole (with reflector) maximum gain assessed at gr = 3 dB, the mismatch loss 0.1 dB, the
               cable loss 1.3 dB and the splitter loss 2 dB; hence, the global transmitter losses Lr = -3.4 dB.
                  The global receiver losses L and calculated by taking the receiver vertical electric
                                          R
               half wavelength dipole antenna maximum gain was theoretical g R  =  2.14 dB, the mis­
                                              1
               match loss 0.5 dB, and the cable loss  . 5 dB; hence, the global receiver losses were L R  =
               -2 dB.
               The overall path loss in dB can be expressed as

                                                                                (6.7.3.1.7)


               6. 7 .3 .2   Prediction versus Measured Data
               6.7.3. . 1    LOS  Scenario  Two experiments were carried out. One is at 118 MHz (VHF)
                    2
               In the plot, the SWR, the splitter, and cable loss were set to unity. A Beechcraft 90 aircraft
               was at a flight level of 6000 m and was flying along the runway axis from 20 nm north
                                               1
               to 20 nm south. One nautical mile =  8 52 m = 6080 ft. The nature of the ground was
               found to be smooth (� h = 0 in Eq. [6.7.3.1.5]) and dry (£, = 2, cr = 0.05 S/m). Figure 6.7.3.1
               shows two models: the free space large-scale model and the direct-reflected large-scale
               model were used to compare with the measured data. The direct-reflected large-scale
               model is in very good agreement with the large-scale measured fading data. But the
               free space model cannot predict the large-scale fading.
                  The next experiment was at a lower flight level but kept the same conditions.
               Figure 6.7.3.2 shows the power measurements and predictions for a receiver alti­
               tude of 1500 ft (460 m). We see that the direct-reflected model prediction is less
   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   417