Page 189 - Intelligent Digital Oil And Gas Fields
P. 189

Components of Artificial Intelligence and Data Analytics     145


              acquired using emerging sensing technology like distributed acoustic sensors
              (DAS) or distributed temperature sensors (DTS), which can record events
              every 1/10 of a second and transmit using down-hole optical couplings.
              It is worth emphasizing that stream computing does not provide the models
              needed by E&P. Rather it provides the new concept of computing infra-
              structure where the data is being generated without concern of scalability,
              complexity, or bandwidth, and integrated into real-time drilling and pro-
              duction automation and optimization models.

              REFERENCES
              Aamodt, A., Plaza, E., 1994. Case-based reasoning: Foundational issues, methodological
                 variations and system Approache. Artif. Intell. Commun. 7 (1), 39–52.
              Alain Charles Publishing, 2015. Decoding big data, report on big data analytics for oil & gas
                 Conference. Oil Rev. Middle East 18 (7), 160–171. https://issuu.com/alaincharles/
                 docs/orme_7_2015/3.
              Begg, S.H., Bratvold, R.B., Welsh, M.B., 2014. Uncertainty vs. Variability: What’s the
                 Difference and Why is it Important? SPE-169850-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/
                 169850-MS.
              Braswell, G., 2013. Artificial Intelligence Come of Age in Oil and Gas. SPE-0113-0050-JPT.
                 https://doi.org/10.2118/0113-0050-JPT.
              Bravo, C., Saputelli, L., Rivas, F., P erez, A.G., Nikolaou, M., Zangl, G., et al., 2014. State of
                 the Art of Artificial Intelligence and Predictive Analytics in the E&P Industry:
                 A Technology Survey. SPE 150314-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/150314-PA.
              Brownlee, J., 2014. Jump-Start Machine Learning in R: Apply Machine Learning With
                 R Now. Machine Learning Mastery. http://machinelearningmastery.com/.
              Brul e, M., 2009. Using massively parallel processing databases. Digital Energy J. (20), 22–24.
                 http://www.digitalenergyjournal.com/issues/dej20web.pdf.
              Brul e, M.R., 2013. Big Data in E&P: Real-Time Adaptive Analytics and Data-Flow Archi-
                 tecture. SPE-163721-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/163721-MS.
              Cipolla, C., 2015. In: How do we optimize hydraulic fracturing in shale resource plays?
                 Learning from the past and predicting the future.Plenary Session at the SPE Hydraulic
                 Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodlands, TX, USA, 3–5 Feb.
              Crnkovic-Friis, L., Erlandson, M., 2015. Geology Driven EUR Prediction Using Deep
                 Learning. SPE-174799-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/174799-MS.
              Davies, B., 2014. Big Data promises big opportunity. Petrol. Rev., 14–16. https://
                 knowledge.energyinst.org/Energy-Matrix/product?product¼94368.
              Davis, B., 2015. The 7 pillars of Big Data. Petrol. Rev., 34–36. https://knowledge.
                 energyinst.org/Energy-Matrix/product?product¼94394.
              Dean, J., Ghemawat, S., 2008. MapReduce: simplified data processing on large clusters.
                 Commun. ACM—50th Anniv. Issue: 1958–2008 51 (1), 107–113.
              Dossary, M., Al-Turki, A., Harbi, B., 2016. Self-Organizing Maps for Regions Exploring
                 and Identification Based on Geological Signatures, Similarities and Anomalies. SPE-
                 182827-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/182827-MS.
              Fernandez-Delgado, M., Cernadas, E., Barro, S., Amorim, D., 2014. Do we need hundreds
                 of classifiers to solve real world classification problems? J. Mach. Learn. Res.
                 15, 3133–3181.
              Gao, C., Gao, H., 2013. Evaluating Early-time Eagle Ford Well Performance Using Mul-
                 tivariate Adaptive Regression Splines. SPE-166462-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/
                 166462-MS.
   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194