Page 217 - Intelligent Digital Oil And Gas Fields
P. 217

Workflow Automation and Intelligent Control                  171


                45,000                                                      100
                       Flow meter, MSCF/d  VFM, MSCF/d  Well test, MSCF/d  NonStac VFM, MSCF/d  Chk size
                                                                            90
                40,000
                                                                            80
                35,000
                                                                            70
               Gas flow rates. MSCF/d  25,000                 48/64"        50
                30,000
                                                                            60

                20,000
                                                                            40
                15,000
                           24/64"            32/64"                         30
                10,000                                                      20

                 5000                                                       10
                   0                                                        0
                     12 34567 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
                                               Time, days
              Fig. 5.10 Monthly gas rate comparison among a flow meter, a regular VFM, a non-
              stationary VFM, and a well test.


              VFM (based on constant BHP pressure) just predicts new rates and stays flat
              until new changes in pressure. The error between the flow meter and the
              well test is 2%, whereas the error between the regular and nonstationary
              VFMs is 8% and 6%, respectively.
                 The relative error of the VFM is calculated in the histogram shown in
              Fig. 5.11. The statistical distribution shows that 81.5% of total gas readings
              were in the range of  8%, which is an acceptable value. The table in Fig.
              5.11 shows that the average error could be about  5; the main reason for
              mismatch could be attributed to one of the following: (1) reading the wrong
              THP data (+0.55), (2) adjustment of the multiphase flow correlation coef-
              ficient (+0.35), or (3) flowing under loading effect ( 0.25).
                 Using public data we have classified this information for different kinds
              of hydrocarbon fluids and found that the most complex fluid to be measured
              with a multiphase flow meter and VFM is gas condensate (error 16%), par-
              ticularly for those wells with f BHP below dew point pressure. One of the pos-
              sible factors that affect the misreading in gas condensate is the lack of PVT or
              equation-of-state (EoS) calibrations. In an oil system ( 8%), the common
              error factors are data problems and flowing the well under critical condition.
              For a heavy oil system, reading gas rate is a common problem (error 13%);
              heavy oil wells produce with slugging flow regimes (difficult to lift oil to the
              surface) make it difficult for sensors and VFM readings to correctly calculate
              the values of gas volume.
   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222