Page 220 - Intelligent Digital Oil And Gas Fields
P. 220

Workflow Automation and Intelligent Control                  173


                 Fig. 5.12 plots relative errors between a flow meter with a well test (WT)
              and a VFM with a WT. Fig. 5.12A shows the results of a VFM and a flow-
              meter, which has a correlation factor of 0.80. These results are because of the
              highest points observed in the blue square. Those points are attributed to the
              fact that VFM responds quickly to changes in pressure, whereas, the flow
              meter measures the flow instabilities during choke changes. Fig. 5.12B
              shows the VFM relative error to the WT versus the FM relative error to
              the WT. From this plot, we can make the following conclusions:
              •  VFM and FM relative errors compared to WTs are positive (quadrant I,
                 Fig. 5.12B). We can infer that the WT is wrong, or both the FM and
                 VFM need calibration. There are points beyond the 15% error radius;
                 both the VFM and FM are reading high rates compared with the
                 WT. These points beyond the error radius are attributed to the rates after
                 changing the choke; however, to avoid ambiguities, the WT must be
                 repeated.
              •  VFM negative and FM positive (quadrant II). In this quadrant, few
                 points are observed. The VFM needs to calibrate the multiphase flow
                 equation coefficient or PVT data. The plaque orifice needs to be cali-
                 brated and the FM needs better tuning.
              •  VFM and FM are both negative (quadrant III). The WT value is greater
                 than the FM reading and the VFM calculation. The WT must be
                 repeated.
              •  VFM is positive and FM negative compared to the WT (quadrant IV).
                 Repeat the WT, or calibrate both the FM and VFM. These values are
                 very common when the gas flow is under critical conditions.



              5.3.4 Benefits and Disadvantages of Using VFM
              If economics allow, it is better to have flow meters on each well. However,
              VFM offers several benefits such as
              •  Monitors in real-time multiphase flow gas, oil, and water for all wells in a
                 field.
              •  Allows operators and engineers to be prepared and react quickly to
                 events, to reduce production downtime.
              •  Reduces the cost of installing and maintaining multiphase flow meters.
                 Well-tuned VFM software with sufficient data can achieve similar or
                 better results than physical equipment which may drift from calibration.
              •  Achieves faster and direct production-allocation process compared with
                 typical back-allocation systems which have larger errors.
   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225