Page 120 -
P. 120

3.2  What is cognition?  89     I


















                        about), discussion with others (or oneself), and the use of various kinds of artifacts,
                        (e.g., maps, books, and pen and paper). For example, when planning the best route
                        to get somewhere, say a foreign city, we may ask others, use a map, get instructions
                        from the web, or a combination of these. Reasoning also involves working through
                        different scenarios and deciding which is  the  best option or solution to a given
                        problem. In the route-planning activity we may be aware of  alternative routes and
                        reason through the advantages and disadvantages of  each route before deciding on
                        the best one. Many a family argument has come about because one member thinks
                        he or she knows the best route while another thinks otherwise.
                            Comparing different sources of  information is  also common practice when
                        seeking information on the web. For example, just as people will phone around for
                        a range of  quotes, so too, will they use different search engines to find sites that
                        give the best deal or best information. If  people have knowledge of  the pros and
                        cons of different search engines, they may also select different ones for different
                        kinds of queries. For example, a student may use a more academically oriented one
                        when looking for information for writing an essay, and a more commercially based
                        one when trying to find out what's happening in town.
                            The extent to which people engage in the various forms of  reflective cognition
                        depends on their level of  experience with a domain, application, or skill. Novices
                        tend to have limited knowledge and will often make assumptions about what to do
                        using other knowledge about similar situations. They tend to act by trial and error,
                        exploring and experimenting with ways of doing things. As a result they may start
                        off being slow, making errors and generally being inefficient. They may also act ir-
                        rationally, following their superstitions and not thinking ahead to the consequences
                        of  their actions. In contrast, experts have much more knowledge and experience
                        and are able to select optimal strategies for carrying out their tasks. They are likely
                        to be able to think ahead more, considering what the consequences might be of
                        opting for a particular move or solution (as do expert chess players).
   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125