Page 90 - Intro to Tensor Calculus
P. 90

85























                                                 Figure 1.3-15. Rotation of axes


                   A similar situation exists in three dimensions. Consider two sets of Cartesian axes, say a barred and
               unbarred system as illustrated in the figure 1.3-14. Let us translate the origin 0 to 0 and then rotate the
               (x, y, z) axes until they coincide with the (x, y, z) axes. We consider first the rotation of axes when the
                                                                                            k
               origins 0 and 0 coincide as the translational distance can be represented by a vector b ,k =1, 2, 3. When
               the origin 0 is translated to 0 we have the situation illustrated in the figure 1.3-15, where the barred axes
               can be thought of as a transformation due to rotation.
                   Let
                                                     r                                                (1.3.37)
                                                     ~ = x b e 1 + y b e 2 + z b e 3
               denote the position vector of a variable point P with coordinates (x, y, z) with respect to the origin 0 and the
               unit vectors b e 1 , b e 2 , b e 3 . This same point, when referenced with respect to the origin 0 and the unit vectors
               ˆ   ˆ  ˆ
               e 1 , e 2 , e 3 , has the representation
                                                     r    ˆ     ˆ    ˆ                                (1.3.38)
                                                     ~ = x e 1 + y e 2 + z e 3 .
               By considering the projections of ~ upon the barred and unbarred axes we can construct the transformation
                                             r
               equations relating the barred and unbarred axes. We calculate the projections of ~ onto the x, y and z axes
                                                                                       r
               and find:
                                         ~ · b e 1 = x = x( e 1 · b e 1 )+ y( e 2 · b e 1 )+ z( e 3 · b e 1 )
                                         r            ˆ          ˆ          ˆ
                                         ~ · b e 2 = y = x( e 1 · b e 2 )+ y( e 2 · b e 2 )+ z( e 3 · b e 2 )
                                         r            ˆ          ˆ          ˆ                         (1.3.39)
                                         ~ · b e 3 = z = x( e 1 · b e 3 )+ y( e 2 · b e 3 )+ z( e 3 · b e 3 ).
                                         r            ˆ          ˆ          ˆ
                                              r
               We also calculate the projection of ~ onto the x, y, z axes and find:
                                         ~ · e 1 = x = x( b e 1 · e 1 )+ y( b e 2 · e 1 )+ z( b e 3 · e 1 )
                                         r  ˆ             ˆ          ˆ          ˆ
                                         ~ · e 2 = y = x( b e 1 · e 2 )+ y( b e 2 · e 2 )+ z( b e 3 · e 2 )
                                         r  ˆ             ˆ          ˆ          ˆ                     (1.3.40)
                                         ~ · e 3 = z = x( b e 1 · e 3 )+ y( b e 2 · e 3 )+ z( b e 3 · e 3 ).
                                         r  ˆ             ˆ          ˆ          ˆ
               By introducing the notation (y 1 ,y 2 ,y 3 )= (x, y, z)  (y , y , y )=(x, y, z) and defining θ ij as the angle
                                                                       3
                                                                  1
                                                                    2
                                            ˆ
               between the unit vectors b e i and e j , we can represent the above transformation equations in a more concise
   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95