Page 167 - Introduction to Colloid and Surface Chemistry
P. 167

156  The solid-liquid  interface

        1,  Contamination of  the  liquid  usually  influences  the  contact  angle.
        2,  Solid  surfaces  differ  from  liquid  surfaces in  that  they show  a  far
           greater  degree  of  heterogeneity,  even  after  careful  polishing; for
           example,  a  solid  surface polished  to  the  best  optical  standards  is
           wavy  and  pitted  compared  with  a  quiescent  liquid  surface.  To
           obtain a solid surface free from  impurities which are likely to have
           a  significant  effect  on  its properties  is usually very difficult.  It can,
           therefore,  be  appreciated  that  any  measured  property  of  a  solid
           surface  is subject  to  variability  as  a  result of unavoidable sample
           differences.
        3.  In practice,  contact angles are rarely single-valued quantities, but,
           for  a  given  system,  a  range  of  metastable  contact  angles  exists.
           The observed  contact angle will depend  mainly on (a) whether the
           liquid  is  advancing over  a  dry  surface  or  receding  from  a  wet
           surface,  and  (b)  the extent to which the drop is vibrated.  Contact
           angle hysteresis  is most  noticeable  with chemically and/or  geomet-
           rically heterogeneous  surfaces. The difference  between advancing
           and  receding contact  angles may be  as much  as 50°.  Consider  the
           spreading  of  a  liquid  on  a  solid  surface  with  a  mixture  of  high
          energy (low 8) and  low energy (high  0) regions.  Advancing liquid
           will  spread  relatively easily  over  the  high  energy  regions  of  the
           surface,  but  tend  to  stick  and  locate  the  triple  interface  at  low
           energy  regions,  thus  giving  a  high  advancing  contact  angle.
           Receding liquid, on the other hand, will readily vacate low energy
          regions  of  the  surface  and  the  triple  interface  will  tend  to  be
           located  at high energy regions,  thus giving a low receding  contact
          angle.  Contact  angle  hysteresis  on  geometrically  rough  surfaces
          can  be  considered,  to  some  extent,  in  terms  of  a  constant
          microscopic angle  leading  to different macroscopic angles  accord-
          ing  to  the  local  inclination of the  surface.  A common  example of
          contact  angle  hysteresis  is given by raindrops  on  a dirty window-
          pane. Mercury rolls off glass, and other  solids, very easily because
          of  low contact  angle  hysteresis.
        4.  Liquid drops on  anisotropic  solid surfaces will tend  to elongate  in
          the  higher  surface  energy  direction  and  the  contact  angle  will,
          therefore,  vary with  position.

          If  a moderately  large  area  of flat solid  surface is available,  contact
        angles  are  usually  measured  directly from  a  projection  of  a  sessile
        drop  of the  liquid. Alternatively, the  tilting-plate method illustrated
   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172