Page 245 - Introduction to Mineral Exploration
P. 245

228   M.K.G. WHATELEY & B. SCOTT



                  sprinkle, and glue, a sample of rock chips and  1 Mobilization and transport of equipment to
                  panned concentrates from each sample interval  the drilling site. This can vary from movement
                  on to a board so that a continuous visual repres-  along a major road by truck to transport by
                  entation of the hole can be made. Again, de-  helicopter.
                  scriptions must be systematic and quantitative.  2 Setting up at each site and movement
                                                              between successive borehole locations. Again
                                                              costs can vary greatly depending on distance
                  10.3.4  Drilling contracts
                                                              and terrain.
                  Drilling can be carried out with either in-house  3 A basic cost per meter of hole drilled.
                  (company) equipment or it can be contracted  4 Optional items costed individually, e.g.
                  out to specialist drilling companies. In the  cementing holes, casing holes, surveying.
                  latter case the conditions of drilling, amount of  5 Demobilization and return of equipment to
                  work required, and the cost will be specified in  driller’s depot.
                  a written contract. The purpose of drilling is to  All items of cost should be detailed in the
                  safely obtain a representative sample of the tar-  contract. There may be a difference of interest
                  get mineralisation in a cost-effective manner.  between the driller and the company repres-
                  Once the mining company has been assured, in  entative on site, normally a geologist, who is
                  writing, of the drilling company’s safe working  there to see that drilling proceeds according
                  practices, the choice of drilling equipment is  to the company’s plan and the contract. The
                  crucial and much depends upon the experi-   driller may be paid by distance drilled during
                  ence of the project manager. Unless the drilling  each shift whilst the geologist in charge is more
                  conditions are well known test work should,  concerned with adequate core recovery and
                  if possible, be carried out to compare different  that the hole is proceeding to its desired target.
                  drilling methods before any large-scale pro-  The company representative usually signs
                  gram begins (Box 10.3).                     documents at the completion of each shift
                    The main items of cost in a contract are as  where progress and problems are described
                  follows:                                    and it is on the basis of these documents that



                  BOX 10.3 Comparative sampling results from two different drilling methods. (after Springett 1983b.)

                    If drilling conditions are not known a program of test work to compare and contrast appropriate drilling
                    procedures may be desirable before any large scale sampling program is commenced, as in the following
                    example.
                      Silver mineralization 12.2 m thick consisting of fine-grained dolomite and quartz with minor
                    chalcopyrite, galena, and sphalerite occurs in limestone. The silver is principally acanthite but with
                    some native silver. It has been tested by diamond and percussion drilling, and also by mining from a test
                    shaft.
                      Diamond drilling: BQ core, diameter 36.5 mm with samples every 1 m over the total length of 12.2 m;
                    core recovery was 93%. The core was split for assay and the total weight of the overall sample was 10 kg.
                    The weighted assay average was 62 g t  silver. The main concern in diamond drilling was the possibility
                                                  −1
                    of high grade, friable silver mineralization being ground by the diamond bit and washed away by the
                    circulating water.
                      Percussion drilling: With a 1.6-cm-diameter hole samples were collected every 1 m; material recovery
                    was 87%. All the recovered material was taken for the analysis and totalled 255 kg. The weighted assay
                                  −1
                    average was 86 g t . Whilst this method was cheaper than core drilling, there was the possibility that the
                    high specific gravity silver minerals might sink in the column of water in the bore hole and not be fully
                    recovered.
                      Bulk sample: From a 1.1-m square test shaft all the material was taken for assay, totalling 51.8 t. The
                    weighted assay average was 78 g t .
                                              −1
                      Accepting the bulk sample result as the best estimate of silver grade the cheaper percussion drilling
                    method can be used to sample the deposit rather than the more expensive core drilling.
   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250