Page 93 - Introduction to Mineral Exploration
P. 93

76   C.J. MOON & M.K.G. WHATELEY



                                                                            TABLE 5.2  Example of the use of
                  Assay      Zn%        Average grade     Grade using a 1.5%  a grade cut-off to establish the
                  width                 at a 1.5%         weighted average  mining width of a Pb-Zn vein
                                        cut-off           cut-off           deposit.
                  0.30       0.01
                  0.30       0.05
                  0.30       0.13
                  0.20       0.17
                  0.20       0.25
                  0.20       0.64
                  0.20       0.92
                  0.20       1.10
                  0.20       2.30
                  0.20       1.20
                  0.20       2.10       2.26%             1.59%
                  0.20       5.30       over              over
                  0.23       1.40       2.10 m            3.40 m
                  0.15       2.00
                  0.20       1.90
                  0.20       1.80
                  0.20       1.30
                  0.20       2.60
                  0.12       3.50
                  4.00 m     1.35% (overall average)





                  weighting function. The weighted average is  (Box 5.2). In coal analytical work there are
                  calculated until the average falls above the cut-  several ways in which the proximate analyses
                  off, which in this case makes 1.59% Zn over  (moisture, volatile, ash, and fixed carbon con-
                  3.40 m. The inclusion of just one more sample  tents) can be reported; e.g. on an as received,
                  would bring the average down below 1.5%. The  moisture free or dry, ash free basis (Stach 1982,
                  overall weighted average is 1.35% Zn over   Speight 1983, Ward 1984, Thomas 1992).
                  4.00 m.                                       A similar form may well be utilized for sand
                                                              and gravel or crushed rock analyses where the
                                                              geologist requires special test work on his or
                  5.1.5 Laboratory program
                                                              her samples, such as size analysis, aggregate
                  Once the samples have been collected, bagged,  crushing value (ACV), or polished stone value
                  and labeled, they must be sent to the laboratory  (PSV) to name but a few.
                  for analysis. Not only must the elements of   In today’s computerized era, results are often
                  interest be specified, but the type of analyt-  returned to the company either on a floppy disk
                  ical procedure should be discussed with the  or direct to the company’s computer from the
                  laboratory. Cost should not be the overriding  laboratory’s computer via a modem and a tele-
                  factor when choosing a laboratory. Accuracy,  phone link. Care must be taken when entering
                  precision, and an efficient procedure are also  the results thus obtained into the company’s
                  needed. An efficient procedure within one’s  database, that the columns of data in the labor-
                  own office is also required. Sample numbers  atory’s results correspond with the columns
                  and the analyses requested should be noted  in your own data base (discussed in detail in
                  down rigorously on a sample control form    section 9.1). Gold values of several percent and
                  (Box 5.1).                                  copper values in the ppb range should alert
                    An alternative practice is to state clearly the  even the most unsuspecting operator to an
                  instructions for test work on the sample sheet  error!
   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98