Page 142 - Introduction to Paleobiology and The Fossil Record
P. 142

MACROEVOLUTION AND THE TREE OF LIFE  129


             this is true of biologists as well. Nearly all   this is not a helpful character in sorting out
             studies of ecology, behavior and evolution are   the phylogeny of parrots because all other
             tied to a phylogenetic tree of the organisms    birds have beaks too. True parrots have blue
             involved. Since 1990 phylogenetic trees have    and green feathers that have a special irides-
             been springing up everywhere, both because      cent quality not seen in the feathers of cocka-
             of new techniques for discovering trees and a   toos. But such special light-refl ecting feathers
             realization that nothing in biology means any-  are seen also in many other bird groups, and
             thing without a tree.                           so are plesiomorphic for parrots.
                                                               Phylogenetically informative characters
                                                             identify clades, or monophyletic groups. These
             Cladistics: reconstructing life’s hierarchy
                                                             are groups that had a single origin and include
             For centuries, biologists have struggled with   all the descendants of that common ancestor.
             the search for the true pattern of relationships   A good example of a clade is the Psittaci-
             among organisms: how is the tree of life to be   formes, the parrots, a group that has long

             discovered? Debates about whether birds         been identified as real and distinct from all
             originated from dinosaurs, whether annelids     others by naturalists. Clades are distinguished
             and arthropods are close relatives or not, or   from two kinds of non-natural groups: (i)
             whether the gorilla or chimp is the closest     paraphyletic groups, which had a single
             relative of humans, all hinge on the need to    common ancestor, but do not include all
             identify patterns of relationships correctly.   descendants, such as the Reptilia, which
               If you had the task of sorting out the rela-  excludes birds and mammals; and (ii)  poly-
             tionships among 100 species of parrots, where   phyletic groups, which are random assem-
             would you begin? You might note the color       blages of organisms that arose from more
             of their feathers, and classify them into a blue   than one ancestor, and so have no place in the
             group, a red group and a green group. But       search for the tree of life.
             then you might notice that body size or beak      Willi Hennig (1913–1976), an eminent
             shape gives a different classifi cation.  If  you   German entomologist, realized the difference
             then looked at the internal anatomy of the      between phylogenetically informative and
             100 parrots, you might fi nd an entirely differ-  uninformative characters, and between mono-
             ent classification based on the shape of the     phyletic and paraphyletic/polyphyletic groups.

             skull, the bones of the wing, or the arrange-   He stressed the need to develop a new, more
             ment of muscles or arteries. Up to 1960, sys-   objective method in systematics, which has
             tematists had a hard task in seeking to decide   come to be called cladistics. The fundamental
             which characters were “good” and which          aim of cladistics is to identify clades, and
             were “bad”. Good characters are  phyloge-       so to discover, or reconstruct, the tree of life.
             netically informative, that is, indicative of the   Patterns of relationships are shown as branch-
             true phylogeny, but what about the bad, or      ing diagrams, or cladograms (e.g. Fig. 5.8), in
             uninformative, characters?
               Phylogenetically uninformative characters
             fall into two main categories: convergences                     sea squirt  amphioxus
             and plesiomorphies.  Convergence in evolu-       shark  salmon  frog     shark  salmon  frog
             tion is when features, or organisms, evolve to
             look the same perhaps because they live the
             same way. The marsupial mole of Australia                VERTEBRATA              VERTEBRATA
             looks just like the northern hemisphere mole,            ?bone                   bone
                                                                                              skull
             with great paddle-like limbs, poor eyesight              ?skull              CHORDATA
                                                                      ?tail
             and an excellent sense of smell, because they   (a)             (b)          tail
             both burrow and eat worms, and yet they are
             not closely related. Two species of parrots     Figure 5.8  Reconstructing the phylogeny of
             might have convergently evolved a red patch     vertebrates by cladistic methods. (a) Are the
             of feathers on their wings as a signal. Plesio-  defining features of vertebrates the possession of

             morphies are characters that are shared by the   bone, a skull and a tail? (b) The tail is found in
             organisms of interest, say parrots, but also by   a wider group, termed the Chordata, but the
             other groups. So, all parrots have beaks, but   skull and bone defi ne the Vertebrata.
   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147