Page 216 - Key Words in Religion Media and Culture
P. 216

Text  199

             definition but extend it to include spoken language. A text would hence be a
             configuration of verbal signs recognized as having coherence and addressivity
             by its users.
               With regard to the analysis of texts, the scholarly study of both religion and
             media has prompted a dazzling array of literary and textual methodologies.
             Scriptural hermeneutics constitutes one of the oldest Western traditions of
             textual scholarship. English literary studies as a discipline emerged in the
             mid-nineteenth century and since then has been formulating methods for
             how best to interpret texts. Over the last half-century, media, cultural, and
             literary studies have prompted and formed part of the linguistic turn of the
             humanities and social sciences, which has sought to analyze the multivalent
             nature of discourse and textuality. In Barthes’s memorable phrasing, texts
             are objects of “shimmering depth,” “vast cultural spaces through which our
             person…is  only  one  passage.”  Texts  are  filled  with  the  elusive  “rustle  of
             language” (1989: 31).
               These rich legacies of textual analysis are well known and have produced
             evermore  ingenious  ways  of  interpreting  oral  or  written  texts  (or  both).
             Yet,  some  of  these  approaches  tend  to  assume  that  a  text  is  self-evident.
             They seldom ask the prior question of how a text comes to be defined as
             such.  Addressing  this  question  requires  an  engagement  with  questions  of
             readership, reception, audiences, and publics.
               This is a crowded field. Media studies has a long tradition of studying
             audiences. Earlier models of the “silver bullet” text piercing the consciousness
             of the passive viewer-reader have given way to ideas of the active reader-
             viewer  wherein  consumption  of  a  text  is  simultaneously  its  production.
             Put differently, any reading of a text generates a new text. An allied body
             of scholarship on the public sphere has asked broader questions about the
             notions of social solidarity that may emerge from the shared consumption of
             particular texts and discourses (Warner 2002).
               The anthropology of religion is also relevant. This body of scholarship
             asks questions about how words and objects must be aligned in religious
             ceremonies for these words to acquire spiritual significance (Keane 2007;
             Engelke 2007). As Webb Keane demonstrates, in Sumba, Indonesia, for the
             ancestors to pay attention to an intercessory ritual, a sacrifice of a particular
             animal must be accompanied by a recognized set of rhetorical forms uttered
             by a particular person. Likewise, a Catholic communion minimally requires a
             consecrated host to be accompanied by certain verbal formulas pronounced
             by a priest.
               Histories and ethnographies of reading have equally illuminated questions
             of  religious  textual  community  and  how,  through  endless  repetition,
             religious  texts  come  to  assume  authority  and  canonicity.  Whether  Bible
             reading groups among South Africa’s black poor (West 1999) or a yeshiva in
   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221