Page 44 - Key Words in Religion Media and Culture
P. 44

Aesthetics  27

             is to understand the genesis of religious experiences and subjectivities as a
             process in which the personal and the social are inextricably bound up with
             each other.

             Religious aesthetics

             Religious  aesthetics,  in  the  current  sense,  refers  to  an  embodied  and
             embedded praxis through which subjects relate to other subjects and objects
             and which is grounded in and offers the ground for religious experience.
             To grasp the link between aesthetics and experience, we propose to take
             as a starting point those religious forms that organize encounters between
             human beings and the divine, as well as with each other, and make individual
             religious  experience  intersect  with  transmitted,  shared  forms.  To  get  at
             this process of intersection, through which the personal and the social are
             aligned, we introduce the notion of sensational form. We understand these
             forms  as  relatively  fixed,  authorized  modes  of  invoking  and  organizing
             access to the transcendental, thereby creating and sustaining links between
                                                             4
             believers in the context of particular religious regimes.  Sensational forms
             are transmitted and shared; they involve religious practitioners in particular
             practices of worship and play a central role in forming religious subjects.
             We outline here a number of key dimensions of sensational forms so as to
             highlight our understanding of aesthetics as an embodied and embedded
             praxis.
               First,  sensational  forms  organize  encounters  with  an  invisible  beyond,
             the realm of spirits or the transcendental. By authorizing certain practices
             of  mediation  as  truthful  and  valid,  religious  traditions  endorse  specific
             modalities  through  which  this  realm  can  be  accessed  (and,  from  a  more
             distant perspective, produced), entailing certain restrictions and suggesting
             appropriate  modes  of  getting  in  touch  that  involve  the  senses  in  various
             ways. In the example of Hindu image practices given above, worshippers
             attribute a certain spiritual power to the photographs of the gods. The gods
             are  not  only  rendered  present  via  mass-produced  representations  but  are
             held to engage with worshippers via a mutual process of seeing and being
             seen,  or  darshan.  Though  there  is  a  lot  of  work  on  images  and  icons  as
             particular sensational forms that render present a divine force (Meyer 2005,
             Morgan 2005), it is important to look further than the nexus of pictures and
             vision, as pinpointed by current work on matters such as spirit possession
             wherein a person embodies a spirit (e.g., Morris 2000; Sanchez 2001; Van
             de Port 2005, 2006) or the linkage between voice and charismatic power
             in Christian (De Abreu 2005; De Witte 2005; Wiegele 2005) and Islamic
             settings (Schulz 2003). The point is to establish how certain material forms
             are vested with the capacity to render present divine power. The aesthetic
   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49