Page 235 - Materials Chemistry, Second Edition
P. 235

224                                                   R. Laleman et al.

              An important conclusion than can be drawn from this is that using a weighted
            multidimensional method, such as the Eco-Indicator, can lead to surprising results.
            The advantage of providing an overall score that takes into account many types of
            environmental impact and provides an elegant overview is unfortunately related to
            the disadvantage of the subjectivity of the weighting step. One cannot have one (a
            single overall score) without the other (some kind of weighting).


            3.4.3 Mineral Extraction

            Given the large impact that the individualist places on mineral extraction, it can be
            interesting to have a closer look at this particular aspect of ‘‘sustainability’’ which
            is rarely considered in the literature (Kato et al. 1997; Ito et al. 2003; Pehnt 2006;
            Raugei et al. 2007a, b). Table 5 shows that the production of PV systems requires
            a vast amount of minerals, even if most of the metals are assumed to be recycled
            (ecoinvent report n°6). However, when compared to the weight of 3 a kWp PV
            system, the results are not that surprising (Table 4). Removing the aluminum
            frames can significantly reduce the CED—and by consequence the environmental
            impact—of a solar panel (Alsema and Nieuwlaar 2000) but this is rarely done in
            practice.



            4 Literature Review


            4.1 Energy Payback Time Review

            The EPT has been a popular measure to estimate the environmental impact of PV
            systems. The overview presented in Fig. 8 indicates that the data from the Eco-
            invent database are in line with results found in the literature. Generally speaking,
                                                            2
            the EPT is 4–5 years in a low-irradiation case (950 kWh/m /y) and 2–3 years in a
                                         2
            high irradiation case (1,700 kWh/m /y).


            Table 5 Life-cycle crude ore extraction of iron, aluminum, and copper for a 3 kWp PV
            installation (Ecoinvent v2.0) and total weight of a 3 kWp PV system (calculations based on
            Ecoinvent report n°6)
            Mineral Ore  Mono c-Si  Multi c-Si  a-Si  CdTe     CIS     Ribbon Si
            Fe (kg)     103.23     106.50     189.13  112.94    77.43   77.22
            Al (kg)      75.95      80.54     145.04  135.17    89.66   87.95
              d
            Cu (kg)      25.30      25.41      26.37   39.44    24.14   25.56
            Weight of 3 kWp PV system (PV modules only)
            Weight (kg)  311       333        379     804      496     364
            d
             Is the sum of all the Copper ore types available in Ecoinvent (v2.0)
   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240