Page 229 - Lindens Handbook of Batteries
P. 229

ZINC-CARBON BATTERIES—LECLANCHÉ AND ZINC CHLORIDE CELL SYSTEMS       9.23


























                                  FIGURE  9.19  Comparison  of  Leclanché  and  zinc  chloride  D-size  cells  of  various  grades  discharged  on  the
                                  ANSI LIF test (4 min/h, 8 h/day) through 2.2 ohm at 20°C. GP: General purpose; HD: Heavy duty; EHD: Extra
                                  heavy duty.



                                1.0:1.5, respectively. Comparison between the Leclanché (LC) and zinc chloride (ZC) GP, HD, and
                                EHD batteries showed ratios of 1:1.3:2.2:3.4:4.4 for LC, GP:ZC, GP:LC, HD:ZC, HD:ZC, EHD
                                respectively.
                                   Figure 9.19 shows a comparison of the same battery grades discharged intermittently through
                                a 2.2 ohm load on the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) light intermittent flashlight
                                (LIF) test. On this regimen, the performance ratio to the 0.9 V cutoff is 1:1 for the GP batteries,
                                1:1.3 for the HD, and for the LC, GP:ZC, GP:LC, HD:ZC, HD:ZC, EHD, 1:1:1.7:2.1:2.9, respec-
                                tively. Testing on the intermittent discharge, which allows for a rest period for recovery, results in
                                increased performance for all batteries and evidences a decreased difference in performance between
                                the grades.
                                   Figure 9.20 illustrates the same battery grades discharged continuously through the lighter
                                3.9 ohm load. The following ratios were obtained; 1:1.3 GP, 1:1.4 HD, and 1:1.3:2.0:2.8:3.5 between
                                all grades to the 0.9 V cutoff. Less of a difference was observed than that obtained at the heavier
                                2.2 ohm discharge rate. The slower reaction rate at the lighter drain is evident because of the higher
                                battery voltages. A comparison of an intermittent discharge at 3.9 ohm for 1 h/day on a simulated
                                cassette test is shown in Fig. 9.21. On this regimen, the performance ratio for the same grouping of
                                battery grades drops to 1:1.1:1.5:2.4:2.7. This reflects the increase in service and tighter grouping
                                for all grades.
                                   These battery grades are compared once again in Fig. 9.22 on a moderate discharge through a
                                24 ohm resistor for 4 h continuously with 20 h of rest on the ANSI transistor radio and electronic
                                equipment battery tests. At this more moderate discharge load, the performance ratio is even closer,
                                1:1.4:1.6:1.9:2.0 to a 0.9 V cutoff.
                                   Continuous  discharge  tends  to  increase  the  difference  in  performance  between  the  different
                                grades of batteries of the same size. The differences between the Leclanché and zinc chloride sys-
                                tems are evident when tested continuously. Intermittent discharges tend to reduce the differences
                                between systems and grades. Similarly, higher discharge currents tend to increase the performance
                                difference.
                                   Figure 9.23a summarizes the performance of the Leclanché general-purpose D-size battery grade
                                discharged continuously to different end voltages. The performance of the zinc chloride general-purpose
   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234