Page 112 - Literacy in the New Media Age
P. 112

A SOCIAL THEORY OF TEXT 101

              In  the  three  texts  there  are  many  other  linguistic  and  textual  features
            which have social import; in fact, all of them do. For instance, the heavily formal
            language  of  the  ‘Swimming  Club  Rules’  speaks  of  the  (borrowed)  weight  of
            bureaucratic language and the institutions in which it is produced. Look, as just
            one  instance,  at  the  subject  noun-phrase  ‘being  absent  far  more  than  three
            consecutive  sessions  without  explanation  to  the  membership  secretary’  or  take
            the impersonality of the address to members. This text was written by a group of
            young mothers of very young children, all well-educated women, who knew each
            other socially and frequently met in each other’s houses; a fact which shows the
            social  significance  of  genre  even  more:  to  step  into,  to  assume  the  forms  of  a
            genre,  is  to  step  into  a  specific  social  world  with  its  vastly  ramified  values,
            practices and obligations.
              The genre of rules and regulations is not all that easily accommodated in the
            broad classificatory schema of the generic types of the Australian genre school,
            though the genre of procedure may be relatively close to what is going on here.
            If you look at the ‘beach house holiday units’ text you get closer to a sense of that
            genre.  Nevertheless  my  three  examples  present  their  rules  in  a  relatively
            unordered  fashion  or,  to  put  this  more  honestly,  I  cannot  readily  make  out  the
            principles of the ordering. I suspect that in all three cases there are principles of
            order: the rule about turning off heaters comes aptly at the end, as you leave the
            flat, so to speak. And maybe in the ‘Swimming Club Rules’ the writers did not want
            to start with the merely officious rule about carrying membership cards (this was
            1974 after all), and felt that parental responsibilities should be the first concern.
            Procedural  genres,  like  all  genres,  project  a  world  with  a  larger  order,  a
            coherence: whether, as in the recipe for duck à l’orange, the necessary sequence
            of steps to achieve the perfect dish, or in the procedure through which a scientific
            experiment, an industrial process, or a social event is set out.
              The important point is to be aware of the fundamental tension around genre,
            uneasily  hovering  between  regularity  and  repeatability  on  the  one  hand  –  the
            effect  of  social  stabilities  and  of  regulations  erected  around  text  to  keep  them
            close  to  ‘convention’  –  and  the  dynamic  for  constant  flux  and  change  on  the
            other  hand.  These  are  the  effect  both  of  inevitable  social  change  (even  in  the
            most conservatively stable societies) and of the constantly transformative action
            of people acting in ever-changing circumstances (even where the changes are of
            the subtlest kind). The current interest in genre may, paradoxically, be an effect
            of social, economic, political changes of the most far-reaching kind, which are
            precisely  unmaking  the  conditions  of  stability,  repeatabilty,  recognisability.  So
            just  when  the  concept  was  introduced  into  education,  in  Australia  in  the
            mid-1980s – with a clear emphasis on stability – it had ceased to have the tight
            connection to social conditions which had given it (the appearance of) stability.
            In other words, in some senses the concept’s potency was discovered in theory
            (and  introduced  into  educational  practice)  just  at  the  very  moment  when  the
            social conditions had become such as to make the concept problematic.
   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117