Page 137 - Literacy in the New Media Age
P. 137

126 LITERACY IN THE NEW MEDIA AGE

              2 from horizontal connection to vertical hierarchy;
              3 from simple linking to (complex) embedding;
              4 from relations which are lexically and intonationally expressed, to relations
               which are syntactically expressed; and
              5 from open syntactic structures to the fusion of closed lexical elements, as in
               nominalisations producing a new quasi-‘word’.

            Integration  of  clauses  through  syntactic  fusions  of  various  sorts,  and  the
            hierarchical subordination of a number of clauses to other clauses, produces the
            form of a full writing-like sentence.
              To  summarise,  in  speech  the  textual-syntactic  framings  of  clauses  are
            relatively  clear;  each  one  is  discreet.  The  material  means  for  framing  are  the
            voice, through pitch variation and through variations in energy; these become the
            modal means of intonation, which ‘affords’ pitch prominence and pitch contours,
            and  rhythm,  which  ‘affords’  rhythmic  structures,  such  as  ‘feet’.  In  writing,  the
            textual-syntactic framings of sentences are clear. The material means are spacing,
            use of graphic devices such as capitals, full stops and so on, which become the
            modal  means  of  layout  and  of  punctuation.  The  conceptual,  textual  and  social
            orientation of the sentence is different to that of the clause. The material means of
            framing are materially different: sound in temporal sequence, and graphic marks
            disposed in linear-spatial order.
              The move from most speech-like to most writing-like organisation is a gradual
            and  subtle  one,  involving  changes  in  the  material  means  of  framing  –  the
            disappearance of voice for instance – although there are recognisable stages on
            this route. Writers tend to place themselves carefully at a particular point on this
            path, anywhere between its starting point of a loose, chaining structure of clauses
            and  its  endpoint  of  full  syntactic  integration.  Each  point  has  particular  social
            meanings for that writer around social affiliation, in her or his imagined relation
            to their addressee(s): from full solidarity to full distance in power. If I imagine
            myself  to  have  solidarity  with  a  group  that  constitutes  its  relations  around  the
            open, informal meanings of speech, then that is my reference point. If I imagine
            myself as having solidarity with a group that constitutes its relations around the
            less open, formal meanings of writing, then that is my reference point. The move
            derives its meaning from that starting point, its direction and extent.
              At the endpoint of most writing-like forms, we find the resources of written
            syntax used to produce new words. This is a move that marks the fullest degree
            of  syntactic  integration  of  clauses,  the  point  furthest  from  the  open  clausal
            structures of speech. Here syntactic structures have been fused to become lexical
            elements,  new  words.  Punctuation  in  the  usual  sense  appears  only  for  some
            sections of this route, or maybe it is better to say that it is visible for only a part
            of  the  sequence.  In  other  words,  if  punctuation  is  the  overt  marking  of
            conceptual/syntactic/textual  ordering,  then  that  ordering  takes  many  different
            forms, at all points along this route, and uses many semiotic resources, syntactic
            integration being the one most in evidence at the fully writing-like end.
   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142