Page 141 - Literacy in the New Media Age
P. 141

130 LITERACY IN THE NEW MEDIA AGE

            nouns derived from full clausal structures.) Here the point is that in the passage
            from most speech-like to most writing-like forms, textual/linguistic material has
            undergone intense ordering and restructuring, the marks of which are invisible in
            the reordered structure. Here punctuation in the narrower sense does not appear at
            all.  The  nominalisation  ‘the  recent  call  for  taxation  reform’  is  an  instance  of  a
            new  noun(-like)/word-element  having  been  formed  syntactically  from  an
            ‘original’ form that might have been something like ‘someone recently called for
            a  reform’.  This  new  element  functions  as  a  subject  noun-phrase,  and  one  does
            not  have  to  work  very  hard  to  imagine  social-political  circumstances  in  which
            ‘call  for  taxation’  could  become  a  noun;  certainly  ‘taxation  call’  seems  a  very
            plausible candidate for elevation to the dictionary.
              If the possibility of judgement of syntactic and then cognitive kinds existed in
            the case of the first sentence, it exists no less here. This writer’s sentences show
            accomplished syntactic ordering, and from there it is an equally short step to the
            judgement about conceptual (cognitive) ordering – ‘sophisticated’ might be the
            word used. So before I pass from the discussion of these two examples I should
            mention the issue of gender and its possible role here. Might the first writer have
            been resisting the move to syntactic/conceptual integration? And if so, why? The
            first  sentence  was  written  by  a  young  man,  and  the  second  was  written  by  a
            young  woman.  The  move  to  integration  is  a  move  to  the  conventional  form,
            towards the accepted and the valued form. But it is also a move away from the
            forms of speech through which the young man might be maintaining relations of
            solidarity  with  his  male  peer  group.  And  from  that  perspective  it  might  be  the
            move towards a group with which he does not wish to show solidarity, either in
            terms of gender or of class.
              The  first  essay  received  a  grade  of  12/20,  and  the  second  a  grade  of  18/20.
            Several teachers of economics to whom I showed the two essays judged them to
            be equally competent in terms of the ‘knowledge’ displayed. Choosing your spot
            on the line between speech-like and writing-like writing has its rewards and its
            penalties, though in quite different domains.
              In  an  attempt  to  understand  punctuation,  one  question  is,  where  does  our
            interest in ordering processes and resources begin and end? Which of the many
            means  of  ordering  should  we  treat  as  punctuation?  And  which  of  these  are
            devices for framing? The young woman’s sentence shows little punctuation, but
            very strong framing.
              For  any  written  utterance  we  can  construct  a  quasi-history  of  its  generation.
            The  following  list  shows  one  for  the  sentence  we  have  been  looking  at  in  the
            third example above. It is of course a hypothesis only. The form actually used by
            the author is shown in bold.

              1 [that rejection casts us out to sea] clause 1;
                 [through someone asking the question] clause 2;
                 [‘what might that relationship be?’] clause 3;
   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146