Page 249 - MEMS and Microstructures in Aerospace Applications
P. 249

Osiander / MEMS and microstructures in Aerospace applications  DK3181_c011 Final Proof page 240 1.9.2005 12:31pm




                   240                       MEMS and Microstructures in Aerospace Applications



                          TABLE 11.2
                          Performance Characteristics for Vacuum Arc Thruster System

                          I sp                                     1000 to 3000 sec
                          I-bit                                    10 nN to 30 mN sec
                          Rep. rate                                Single shot 1 kHz
                          Power                                    10 W (30 W)
                          Thrust/Power                             10 nN to 300 mN/W
                          Impulse/prop.                            10 mN/w
                                                                   10 N sec/g
                          Feed mechan.                             Yes
                          Impulse/sys.-mass                        100 N sec/500 g

































                   FIGURE 11.7 Vacuum arc thruster system (includes PPU). (Source: Alameda Applied
                   Sciences Corp.)
                   principle. 22–26  Starting with cesium as the propellant, development of the LMIS has
                   evolved from a single-pin emitter through linear arrays of stacked needles to the
                   presently favored slit emitter module. Compared to other electric propulsion sys-
                   tems, FEEP thrusters have shown high values of thrust-to-power ratio (>100
                   mN/W) at high specific impulses ( 10,000 sec). FEEP thrusters appear to be well
                   adapted to missions requiring a very fine attitude (milli arc seconds) and orbit
                   control (relative positioning of several satellites to millimeter accuracy). This is an
                   application domain where the FEEP system can claim several advantages compared




                   © 2006 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254