Page 40 - Macromolecular Crystallography
P. 40

HIGH-THROUGHPUT CLONING, EXPRESSION, AND PURIFICATION  29

        of the fusion protein is enabled by adding an N-His  that the cell-specific productivity remains the same
        tag to the Ubl (Catanzariti et al., 2004; Malakhov  under different culture conditions. Most small-scale
        et al., 2004). The Ubl can be removed from the tar-  expression screens are carried out in 96- or 24-well,
        get protein in vitro using specific deubiquitylating  deep-well plates using enriched complex media, for
        enzymes now available from recombinant sources.  example TB, 2YT, and GS96 (QBiogene), to ensure
        The cleavage occurs after the final glycine residue  maximum biomass. Typically, these media sup-
        at the carboxy-terminus of the Ubl protein irrespec-  port growth to optical densities (OD) of 5–10 OD 600
        tive of the amino acid that immediately follows, thus  units compared to 2–3 OD 600 units in standard Luria
        regenerating the native N-termini on removal of the  broth (LB). Two options are available for inducing
        fusion partner.                              expression from T7 vectors either by addition of
                                                     IPTG (range 0.1–1.0 mM) or by using a formulation
        2.3 Expression screening                     of glucose and lactose in the media which leads to
                                                     autoinduction (Studier, 2005). In the first method,
        Amajor feature of HTP protein production pipelines  the time of induction and therefore the growth state
        is the inclusion of a screening step at a relatively  of the culture (usually midlog phase) can be prede-
        small scale to identify constructs suitable in terms  termined, whereas in the second method induction
        of soluble protein yield for scale-up and subsequent  occurs usually in late log stage and cannot be con-
        protein purification. Given the relatively high cost  trolled. However, a major operational advantage of
        of the latter steps in terms of time and resources,  the autoinduction method is that once the cultures
        particularly if eukaryotic expression is required, the  have been set up no further manipulation is required
        screening stage is seen as crucial to the overall pro-  prior to harvest and expression evaluation. Further,
        cess. In this section the approaches to the evaluation  in our experience autoinduction can lead to over-
        of expression at small scale will be reviewed.  all higher levels of expression. Another important
                                                     parameter in the expression of recombinant proteins
        2.3.1 E. coli                                in E. coli is the culture temperature; reducing the
                                                     temperature from 37 Cto20 C or even lower has
                                                                            ◦
                                                                     ◦
        2.3.1.1 Choice of strains and media          beenfoundtoimprovethesolubilityoftheexpressed
        For the most part, B strains of E. coli are preferred  protein. By carrying out small-scale expression tests
        for recombinant protein expression since they are  inparallel, varyingmedia, inductionregime, and/or
        deficient in the ATP-dependent lon and membrane-  temperature, the optimum conditions for expression
        associated ompT proteases that may otherwise lead  of a given target protein can be determined.
        to degradation of the heterologously expressed pro-
        tein. A variety of derivatives of the original BL21  2.3.1.2 Assay format
        strain are available, including those carrying addi-  The starting point for any expression assay is
        tional plasmids, which either provide fine control  lysing the cells after harvesting by centrifugation
        of T7 vectors (pLysS see Section 2.2.2.1) or sup-  and then separation of the soluble from insolu-
        ply tRNAs for codons that are relatively rare in  ble fractions. Cell lysis can be carried out using
        E. coli but may be commonly used in eukaryotic  standard protocols by either a freeze-thaw cycle
        proteins. The presence of rare codons, particularly  followed by treatment with DNAse/lysozyme or
        in the first 25 positions, is often a major cause of  by sonication with/without lysozyme. Alterna-
        poor expression (Gia-Fen and Chen, 1990). Special-  tively, commercial detergent-based lysis reagents,
        ized BL21 strains include C41, which appears to  for example BugBuster™ (Merck), FastBreak™
        favour production of membrane proteins, and B834,  (Promega), CelLytic™ (Sigma), and Poppers™
        a methionine auxotroph for biosynthetic labelling  (Pierce) can be used. Chemical methods lend them-
        with selenomethionine (Table 2.1).           selves to 96-well formats, though sonicators which
          The choice of culture media determines the  can accommodate a 96-well plate are available
        biomass achievable in simple batch cultures and  (Misonics). For HTP methods, centrifugation is
        therefore the overall yield of protein. This assumes  generally avoided for fractionation of the lysates,
   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45