Page 202 - Managing Global Warming
P. 202

164                                               Managing Global Warming

         include SCW, including depressurization transients to subcritical conditions. Flow
         stability in the core has been studied numerically. As in BWRs, flow stability can
         be ensured using suitable inlet orifices in fuel assemblies.
            A number of candidate cladding materials have been tested in capsules, autoclaves,
         and recirculating loops up to 700°C at a pressure of 25MPa. Stainless steels with
         >20% chromium (Cr) are expected to have the required corrosion resistance up to
         a peak cladding temperature of 650°C. More work is needed to develop alloys suitable
         for use at the design peak cladding temperatures of 850°C for the Canadian SCWR
         concept. Further work is also needed to better identify the coolant conditions that lead
         to stress-corrosion cracking. It has been shown that the creep resistance of existing
         alloys can be improved by adding small amounts of elements, such as zirconium
         (Zr). In the longer term, the steel experimental Oxide Dispersion Strengthened
         (ODS) alloys offer an even higher potential, whereas nickel-base alloys are being con-
         sidered for use in ultra-supercritical fossil-fired plants are less favorable for use in
         SCWRs due to their high neutron absorption and associated swelling and
         embrittlement.
            Key water chemistry issues have been identified by Guzonas et al. [18]: Predicting
         and controlling water radiolysis and corrosion product transport (including fission
         products) remain the major R&D areas. In this regard, the operating experience using
         nuclear steam reheat at the Beloyarsk NPP in Russia is extremely valuable [1,19].

         4.3.6  Additional reactor classifications

         In several countries, the term “SMR” has been introduced representing the initials of
         “Small Modular Reactor” or “Small-/Medium-sized Reactor,” which addresses some
         of the Generation IV goals. Not presently deployed, these ideas or preliminary designs
         cover a size range from 20 to 600MW el ), and feature claims for lower costs due to
         more factory-based construction techniques and the use of multiple “modules” to
         reduce investment and financial risk. SMRs include many design concepts that span
         from the entire range of the six Generation IV concepts and coolants (PBMRs,
         LMFBRS, etc.) plus others, which are essentially scaled-down LWR systems, e.g., as
         in the NuScale concept currently undergoing licensing review. The idea is to have a
         more flexible system that may also be suitable for remote regions, as being presently
         undertaken by Russia using “ice-breaker” reactor technology, or, of course, for mil-
         itary applications beyond nuclear-powered submarines. Various industry and investor
         groups have promoted these concepts, while seeking fiscal support, first-of-a-kind
         (FOAK) or prototype funding and market acceptance. Some of these SMR concepts
         were recently examined in detail by an extensive Australian Royal Commission study,
         which found them to be not economically competitive on a relative basis [20].It is
         therefore premature to speculate here on the degree or extent to which these smaller
         units may be deployed. (More details on SMRs can be found in [1].)


         4.3.7  Summary
         In summary, Table 4.11 lists estimated ranges of thermal efficiencies (gross)
         of Generation IV NPP concepts for reference purposes (Pioro and Duffey [1,2]).
   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207