Page 561 - Marine Structural Design
P. 561

Chapter 30 Risk Assessment Applied to Offshore Structures             537

                  Prevent Gas Leakage
                  The most effective action for the prevention of gas leakage is to reduce the number of sources
                  for potential leakage, e.g., the number of flanges. This may be easily accomplished for a new
                  platform. However, it is generally more difficult for existing platforms. The number of gas
                  leakage may also be reduced by:
                     improving the maintenance quality in the process area,
                     selecting  high quality material for gaskets, and
                     following up the minor leakage to identify trends and unwanted tendencies.
                  Prevent Ignitable Concentrations
                  The next step to reduce explosion risk is to prevent the formation of any ignitable atmosphere,
                  e.g.,  through extensive natural  ventilation. In  the design phase,  good natural ventilation is
                  normally provided. During operation, ventilation may have been purposely reduced, e.g.  by
                  temporary equipment  being  installed or  left  in  the  openings,  or  to  improve the  working
                  environment. It is therefore a difficult trade-off between the increased natural ventilation and
                  the  deteriorated working conditions. Mechanical ventilation systems may  be  effective for
                  small gas  leakage. However, for  massive gas releases, the  forced  ventilation is  generally
                  insufficient.
                  Prevent Ignition
                  The next option is to prevent an explosive atmosphere from being ignited. Several actions are
                 possible in this aspect. The first action is to reduce the extent of hot work activities. This has
                 been applied successfully on many installations where it has been  proven that a variety of
                 tasks may be done in a ‘cold’ manner. The second action is to improve maintenance of ‘ex-
                 proof  equipment. Attention  should  also  be  given  to  so-called  ‘continuous sources’,  Le.
                 potential ignition sources that are constantly active, such as a lighted flare.
                 The following measures are effective to reduce explosion consequence.
                  Prevent High Turbulence
                 Turbulence is caused by the interaction of the flow with obstacles such as cable trays, pipe
                 racks, etc. The turbulence may increase the burning rate dramatically due to the wrinkling of
                 the flame front by large eddies and the turbulent transport of heat and mass at the reaction
                 front. A number of basic design rules may help prevent the high turbulence, e.g.  optimization
                 of the equipment arrangement, avoidance of multiple equipment pieces, and optimization of
                 the location of pipe racks relative to likely ignition sources.
                 Prevent High Blockage
                 Small sized objects may have the largest effect on module congestion, and in turn lead to high
                 overpressure. The mitigation measures are therefore to:  1) remove temporary installations,
                 containers,  small  obstacles,  and  weather  cladding;  2)  arrange  vessels  in  a  way,  which
                 minimizes blockage of the most likely path of the flame front.
                 Avoid Human Activities from Explosion Potential
                 The location of control rooms, transportation, and  accommodation facilities should be well
                 away from modules with explosion potentials.
   556   557   558   559   560   561   562   563   564   565   566