Page 562 - Marine Structural Design
P. 562

538                                                       Part  V Risk Assessment

                Install Fire and Blast Barriers
                Escalation caused by explosions can be limited by fire and blast baxriers between modules and
                areas.  However, the  barriers  themselves may  cause problems for keeping ventilation and
                introduce more blocks. The constructionhepair of such barriers may involve extensive hot
                work. This measure is therefore more effective in the early design stage.
                Active Deluge on Gas Leakage
                Leakage  may  be  deluged  out  without  causing  any  explosions  or  fires.  Deluge  may  be
                particularly effective in preventing so-called runaway flame accelerations. It may also lead to
                a reduction of the peak overpressure.
                The most critical aspect in the use of deluge is that it must be triggered prior to ignition, e.g.
                on detection of  a  gas  leak. Modeling of ignition has  shown that  the  most  likely interval
                between release and ignition is two to three minutes. Thus deluge activation has to be within
                the first half minute in order to be effective.
                Improve Resistance of Equipment and Structures
                The last possibility of  reducing an  explosion consequence is to  improve the resistance of
                equipment and structures to blast loads. However, it is not cost-effective to design structures
                for the worst explosion case. Therefore this approach may be quite expensive.


                30.4  FireRisk
                In the offshore risk assessment, usually two types of fire risk are considered: the topside fire
                and the  fire on  sea. The following sections mainly deal  with the topside fire. Further, the
                smoke effect analysis and the structural response under the fire are normally integrated into
                the fire risk assessment.
                The distinction between what is classified ‘fire’ and what is called ‘explosion’ is relatively
                subjective.  The  total  loss  of  the  fixed  platform  ‘Piper Alpha’  was  initiated  by  a  small
                explosion, but the damage was primarily due to fire.
                30.4.1  Fire Frequency
                Fire  frequency analysis  is  very  similar to  explosion frequency  analysis. The  overall  fire
                frequency can be expressed as:
                                                                                    (30.4)
                     PFp  = Phk  * PCc  ‘Ignition
                where,
                       PFp   = Frequency of fire
                       Pkak   = Probability of gas leakage
                       PCc   = Probability of gas concentration
                       P,gn,,jo,, =Probability of ignition
                The flammable gaslair concentration range determines whether it is explosion or fire for a
                given ignition. Further, fire scenarios are mainly caused from the following sources: blowout,
                riser failure, pipeline failure, process equipment failure, and dropped object. The uncontrolled
                hydrocarbon flow (blowout or riser failure) is considered as the main fire risk contributor to
                the  structures. Further, dropped objects may  contribute to  fire only when  they  lead  to  the
   557   558   559   560   561   562   563   564   565   566   567