Page 596 - Marine Structural Design
P. 596

572                                                       Pori V Risk Assessment


                 C.  How should the project be carried out?
                 For day-to-day execution of the project, including the selection of  equipment and services
                 from contractors, it is necessary to use criteria that can be easily related to the consequences of
                 such decisions. LCC may be a suitable criterion in this context.
                 32.2.2  Limit State Functions
                 The limit state functions in a probabilistic analysis are defined based on NPV or IRR. LCC
                 criterion could virtually be traced down to NPV criterion.
                 If the event is the achievement of a specified internal rate of return in this project, the limit
                 state function can be formulated as:


                                                                                     (32.1)

                 The total period of 30 year is considered in Fq(32.1).  I, denotes the income generated in the
                 nth year and C,  is the cost in the nth year.  Both 1, and C,, are functions of input variables
                 (basic variables) expressed in  the  equation by  X.  A  negative value of the  function G(X)
                 implies that the internal rate of return is less than the irr .
                 The limit state function for the decision criteria based on the net present value is similarly:



                                                                                     (32.2)
                 In this case, the function G(X) is negative if the net present value is less than the value npv for
                 a corporate rate of return irr .

                 32.3  Economic Risk Modeling
                 The cost variables are related to the cost of design, construction, installation, and  operation
                 (including maintenance). The income variables, however, are related to the reservoir size and
                 characteristics, oil and  gas prices, currency fluctuations, inflation and interest changes, and
                 taxation  rules.  Modeling  the  uncertainties  associated  with  income  and  cost  variables  is
                 therefore the core of economic risk modeling.
                 A typical North Sea oil and gas field project in the development and operation phase is chosen
                 as a representative case to  illustrate the  economic risk  modeling.  These are adapted from
                 Bitner-Gregersen, et a1  (1992).  These data are listed only for the illustrative purpose,  and
                 should be  updated  specifically for each project  considered. The  field is assumed to be  in
                 production for 25  years  afier 5  years  of construction and installation period.  The decision
                 criteria are based on the IRR or NPV, and limit state functions are subsequently defined in the
                 form of Eqn. (32.1) and Eqn. (32.2). Modeling of cost variables, income variables, and their
                 uncertainties are described in the following Sub-sections.
                 32.3.1  Cost Variable Modeling
                 An  overview of  the  costs during development  and  operation phases  are presented below
                 (Odland, 1999):
                    Facility Costs
   591   592   593   594   595   596   597   598   599   600   601