Page 365 - Marketing Management
P. 365

342    PART 5    SHAPING THE MARKET OFFERINGS



                                                               Using sales and cost analysis, product line managers must period-
                                                            ically review the line for deadwood that depresses profits. 37  One
                                                            study found that for a big Dutch retailer, a major assortment reduc-
                                                            tion led to a short-term drop in category sales, caused mainly by
                                                            fewer category purchases by former buyers, but it attracted new cat-
                                                            egory buyers at the same time. These new buyers partially offset the
                                                            sales losses among former buyers of the delisted items. 38
                                                               In 1999, Unilever announced its “Path to Growth” program de-
                                                            signed to get the most value from its brand portfolio by eliminating
                                                            three-quarters of its 1,600 distinct brands by 2003. 39  More than
                                                            90 percent of its profits came from just 400 brands, prompting
                                                            Unilever cochairman Niall FitzGerald to liken the brand reduction
                                                            to weeding a garden, so “the light and air get in to the blooms which
                                                            are likely to grow the best.” The company retained global brands
                                                            such as Lipton, as well as regional brands and “local jewels” like
                                                            Persil, the leading detergent in the United Kingdom.
        Nike’s classic Air Force 1 sneaker
                                        Multibrand companies all over the world try to optimize their brand portfolios. This often
        has been refreshed time and time
                                      means focusing on core brand growth and concentrating resources on the biggest and most es-
        again over the years, as these
                                      tablished brands. Hasbro has designated a set of core toy brands, including GI Joe,
        25th-anniversary models show.
                                      Transformers, and My Little Pony, to emphasize in its marketing. Procter & Gamble’s “back to
                                      basics strategy” concentrated on brands with over $1 billion in revenue, such as Tide, Crest,
                                      Pampers, and Pringles. Every product in a product line must play a role, as must any brand in
                                      the brand portfolio.


                                         Volkswagen  Volkswagen   Volkswagen has four different core brands of particular impor-
                                              tance in its European portfolio. Initially, Audi and Seat had a sporty image and VW and
                                              Skoda had a family-car image. Audi and VW were in a higher price-quality tier than Skoda
                                              and Seat, which had spartan interiors and utilitarian engine performance. To reduce costs,
                                              streamline part/systems designs, and eliminate redundancies, Volkswagen upgraded the
                                      Seat and Skoda brands, which captured market share with splashy interiors, a full array of safety sys-
                                      tems, and reliable power trains. The danger, of course, is that by borrowing from its upper-echelon
                                      Audi and Volkswagen products, Volkswagen could dilute their cachet. Frugal European consumers
                                      may convince themselves that a Seat or Skoda is almost identical to its VW sister, at several thousand
                                      euros less. 40


                                      Product Mix Pricing
                                      Marketers must modify their price-setting logic when the product is part of a product mix. In
                                      product mix pricing, the firm searches for a set of prices that maximizes profits on the total mix.
                                      Pricing is difficult because the various products have demand and cost interrelationships and are
                                      subject to different degrees of competition. We can distinguish six situations calling for product-
                                      mix pricing: product line pricing, optional-feature pricing, captive-product pricing, two-part pric-
                                      ing, by-product pricing, and product-bundling pricing.

                                      PRODUCT LINE PRICING Companies normally develop product lines rather than single
                                      products and introduce price steps. A men’s clothing store might carry men’s suits at three price
                                      levels: $300, $600, and $900, which customers associate with low-, average-, and high-quality. The
                                      seller’s task is to establish perceived quality differences that justify the price differences. 41

                                      OPTIONAL-FEATURE PRICING Many companies offer optional products, features, and
                                      services with their main product. A buyer of the 2010 Subaru Outback 2.5i can order four-way
                                      power passenger seats, an All-Weather package, and a power moon roof as optional features.
                                        Pricing options is a sticky problem, because companies must decide which to include in the
                                      standard price and which to offer separately. Many restaurants price their beverages high and their
                                      food low. The food revenue covers costs, and the beverages—especially liquor—produce the profit.
   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370