Page 284 - Mathematical Techniques of Fractional Order Systems
P. 284

Design of Fractional Order Fuzzy Sliding Mode Controller Chapter | 9  273


             9.7.2  Disturbance Rejection When Disturbance Is Injected at
             Plant Output

             Another disturbance signal is considered at the plant output to study the
             effectiveness of IOSMCPD and FOFSMCPD controllers. In this context, a
             sinusoidal disturbance signal as given in (9.70) is injected where amplitude
             A d 5 0:1 radian and angular frequency ω d 5 0:5 pi rad/s is considered for dis-
             turbance rejection study.
                                      θ d 5 A d sin ω d tf  g          ð9:70Þ
                Analysis is shown in terms of trajectory tracking task where the obtained
             values of IAE and objective functions are shown in Table 9.7. The same
             values are expressed graphically in Fig. 9.21. For this study, a trajectory
             tracking curve is shown in Fig. 9.22 whereas its corresponding controller
             output and error curves are shown in Figs. 9.23 and 9.24.An X Y curve is
             also shown in Fig. 9.25 which confirms the superiority of the FOFSMCPD
             controller over the IOSMCPD controller. After investigating the result, it can
             be inferred that the FOFSMCPD controller shows 9.09% improvement in
             objective function over the IOSMCPD controller. After comparing the IAE
             values, 8.16% and 9.09% improvements are obtained by the FOFSMCPD
             over the IOSMCPD controller in link-1 and link-2, respectively.


              TABLE 9.7 IAE Values and Objective Functions for Disturbance (at Plant
              Output) Rejection Task
                             IAE Link-1    IAE Link-2    Objective function
              IOSMCPD        0.00098       0.0011        0.0022
              FOFSMCPD       0.00090       0.0010        0.0020





















             FIGURE 9.21 IAE and objective function values for disturbance (at plant output) rejection study.
   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289