Page 292 - Mechanics Analysis Composite Materials
P. 292

Chapter 6.  Failure criteria and srrength of  laminates   211

                                    IT, ,MPa









                                                                IT,,MPa









                                  -300
           Fig. 6.9.  Failure envelope for glass-epoxy  fabric composite in plane (a1,CJ?).(-)  maximum stress
           criterion,  Eqs.  (6.2);  (- -- -)  approximation  criterion,  Eqs.  (6.1I),  (6.12); (.  ....)  approximation
                                criterion. Eqs. (6.14); (0) experimental data.


           Fig. 6.9 (experimental data from Gol’denblat and  Kopnov,  1968). Naturally, the
           maximum stress criterion (solid lines in  Fig.  6.9) should not be  used  in  this case
           because it  overestimates material strength, and  the structure can fail under loads
           that are lower than those predicted with this criterion.
             The foregoing discussion concerns fabric composites. Consider a unidirectional
           ply and try to apply to it the maximum stress criterion. First of  all, because the
           longitudinal strength of the ply is controlled by the fibers whose strength is much
           higher than that of the matrix, it is natural to neglect the interaction of stress GIon
           one side and stresses 02  and TI?,  on the other side. In other words, we can apply the
           maximum stress criterion to predict material strength under tension or compression
           in the fiber direction and, hence, use the first part of Eqs. (6.2), i.e.





           Actually, there exist unidirectional composites with very brittle matrix (carbon or
           ceramic) for which the other conditions in  Eqs. (6.2) can be  also applied. As  an
           example, Fig. 6.10 displays the failure envelope for a carbon-carbon unidirectional
           material (experimental data from Vorobey et al., 1992). However, for the majority
           of unidirectional composites, the interaction of transverse normal and shear stresses
           is essential and  should be  taken  into account. This means that  we  should apply
           Eq. (6.1) but can simplify it as follows:
   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297