Page 91 - Mechanics Analysis Composite Materials
P. 91

76                  Mechanics and analysis of composite materials
             crack  in  the central  fiber,  the  load  carried  by  this  fiber  is  transmitted  by  shear
             through the matrix to adjacent fibers. At a distance from the end of the fiber more
             than c, the stress in the broken  fiber becomes close to cr,  and for 3 > &,  the fiber
             behaves  as  if  there  is  no crack.  A  portion  of  the broken  fiber corresponding  to
             0 5 x 5 c. is not fully effective in resisting the applied load, and Zi  = K.a is referred to
             as the fiber ineffective length. Because the fiber defects are randomly  distributed
             along its length, their influence on the strength of the ply is minimal if there are no
             other defects in the central and the adjacent fibers within distance Zi from the crack.
             To minimize the probability of such defects, we should minimize li which depends
             on fiber and matrix stiffnesses and material microstructure.
               To evaluate Zi, consider Eq. (3.47) and assume that cro(X)  becomes close to cr if
                 e-”;“ -
                     -k 7
             where k is some small parameter indicating how close go(%) should be to o to neglect
             the difference between them  (as a  matter  of fact this difference vanishes only for
             X + 00).  Taking approximately  Ai  = 2p in  accordance with  Eq. (3.41)  and using
             Eq. (3.28) specifying ,u we arrive at





             For k = 0.01 we get
                 li = 2.3~/=$           .                                      (3.57)
                         .


              For  a typical  carbon-epoxy  ply  (see Fig. 3.19) with  a = 0.016 mm  and   = 0.6,
              Eq. (3.57) yields 0.29 mm.
               Thus,  for  real  composites,  length  Zi  is  very  small,  and  this  expIains  why  a
             unidirectional composite demonstrates much higher strength in longitudinal tension
             than a dry bundle of fibers (see Table 3.3). Reducing G,,  Le., the matrix stiffness,we




                             1.5
                            1.25
                              1
                            0.75
                             0.5
                            0.25
                                                                     -
                              0                                      X
                                0   5   10  15  20  25  30  35  40  45  50

              Fig. 3.21. Distribution  of  normal  stresses  along  the  fibers  n = 0, I, 2,3,4 for  k = 4,  Er  = 250 GPa,
                                           G,  = 0.125 GPa.
   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96