Page 108 - Mechanics of Asphalt Microstructure and Micromechanics
P. 108

Experimental Methods to Characterize the Heterogeneous Strain F ield   101


              position by the clamping system of the GLWT. In this manner, the cut faces, although
              available for optical imaging at various stages during the rutting process, are located
              within the center of the specimen during actual application of the load by the rutting
              wheel, and thus are isolated from any boundary effects associated with the test system.
              The remainder of the rutting test procedure is implemented as with normal specimens.
                 When the desired number of passes of the simulated rutting wheel has been ap-
              plied, the macro-response of the specimen is determined using the conventional proce-
              dures described by Collins et al. (1996) and Kandhal and Cooley (2003). The specimen
              is then separated into the sub-specimens to enable additional images to be captured
              from the cut faces for subsequent processing and analysis. Photographs of a complete
              section, prior to and after rutting, are shown in Figure 4.2. The indentation from the
              rutting wheel is evident in the post-rutting photograph. Images captured at this scale
              do not have the necessary resolution to permit quantitative measurement of the strains
              in the mastic. Clearly, selection of an appropriate magnification is dependent on the
              characteristic size of the aggregate in the material. Accordingly, the images captured for
              quantitative analysis need to be captured with a CCD camera mounted on a micro-
              scope. For the particular material being examined in the example study, a magnification
              of 7X was found to provide an appropriate level of resolution. Accordingly, the scheme
              shown in Figure 4.3 was selected for capturing images on a given cut section. Pre- and
              post-rutting images, along with their proposed digital counterparts, are shown in Fig-
              ure 4.4. A subsequent montage consisting of eight images (5, 6, 9, 19, 13, 14, 17, 18)
              captured immediately below and adjacent to the location of the rutting wheel is shown
              in Figure 4.5. It is noted that some overlap exists between adjacent images to allow for
              appropriate referencing as required.
















                    (a)                                 Rut Location















                    (b)
              FIGURE 4.2  Cross-section of GLWT specimen (a) prior to and (b) after rutting.
   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113