Page 406 - Mechanics of Asphalt Microstructure and Micromechanics
P. 406

T
   398   Ch a p t e r w e l v e

                                                        Shear     Shear    Shear
                                               Poisson’s  Modulus  Modulus  Modulus G z
              Case E v  (Psi)  E hx (Psi)  E hy  (Psi)  Ratio  G x  (Psi)  G y  (Psi)  (Psi)
              1     100000   100000   100000   0.3      3846.15   3846.15  38461.54
              2     100000    80000    80000   0.3      3846.15   3846.15  30769.23
              3     100000    50000    50000   0.3      3846.15   3846.15  19230.77
              4     100000    20000    20000   0.3      3846.15   3846.15   7692.31
              5     100000    10000    10000   0.3      3846.15   3846.15   3846.15
              Note:  Different expressions but are consistent with the orthotropic model. E v : Modulus in vertical
              direction; E hx : Horizontal modulus in x-direction; E hy : Horizontal modulus in y-direction
              TABLE 12.1  Material properties for the simulation.


              larger the differences in stress and displacement fields. Analysis of the data presented
              in Figures 12.3 and 12.4 and other cases indicates that with the above boundary condi-
              tions and materials properties, the largest effective stress (the von Mises stress) and the
              vertical displacement increases with the increase of anisotropy (about 13% larger for the
              effective stress); the largest tensile stress in y direction decreases with the increase of
              anisotropy. It should be noted that the horizontal stiffness (in y direction) decreases
              with the increase of anisotropy, and therefore the tensile stresses decrease (the normal
              direction is restrained).
                 Although a definitive conclusion (i.e., increase or decrease, safe or unsafe) about the
              trend due to the effects from anisotropy cannot be drawn based on this limited study,
              the analysis indeed indicates some significant differences. Further study to characterize
              the material constants and to apply rational boundary conditions is needed.


        12.5  Analytical Anisotropic Model of
              Multi-Layered System Pavement
              Figure 12.5 presents a multi-layered system of cross-anisotropic materials lying on a
              homogeneous half-space. Pan (1989) and Chen and Pan (2008) presented analytical so-
              lutions for the stresses, strains, and displacements of the layered system under vertical
              and horizontal loading applied on the surface. The general methodology of solving the
              boundary value problem of the multi-layered system is to make use of the Cartesian
              and cylindrical systems of vector functions and of the propagator matrix method.
                 They first introduced the following Cartesian system of vector functions (Equation
              12-3) and expressed the surface loading in Equation 12-4.
                                   L(, ; , )xy αβ =  e (, ; , )S xy αβ
                                               z
                                   M(, ; , ) (xy αβ =  e ∂ + e ∂ Sx y)( , ; , )αβ  (12-3)
                                                x  x  y  y y
                                   N (,  αβ     ∂ −  e ∂  ) S xy; ,β)
                                                               β
                                                             α
                                     xy; , ) (e=
                                                         (,
                                                x  y  y  x
                                    +
                 With  Sx y; , )αβ =  e − i(α x β y) /( π )
                                         2
                       (,
                               +∞
                                                               αβ
                                                 αβ
                                                                     xy ⎤
                                                           +
                                            +
                                   αβ
                      P(, )xy =  ⎣ ∫ ∫  ⎡ P L ( , ) (, ) P M ( , ) (, ) P N ( , )N((, ) d dαβ  (12-4)
                                       L
                                                                        ⎦
                                                     M
                                                       xy
                                         xy
                               −∞
                 Then, they expressed the displacement and surface traction in the vector format in
              Equations 12-5 and 12-6 and in component format in Equations 12-7 and 12-8.
   401   402   403   404   405   406   407   408   409   410   411